Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This puts all the Dem rationalizations in perspective. It turns out Ossoff got fewer votes than a candidate who might not actually exist!
1 posted on 06/24/2017 3:56:32 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: jalisco555

This is a very funny and well written article.

Let us hope the Democrats do not read it.

Nancy Pelosi as party leader, forever—even after she is dead!

Then the Dems can run zombies in all the districts—who would know the difference?


2 posted on 06/24/2017 4:06:35 AM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

Dem candidate Rodney Stooksbury doesn’t actually exist. The DNC/MSM. Fake news, fake candidates.


3 posted on 06/24/2017 4:09:18 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
......turns out Ossoff got fewer votes than a candidate who might not actually exist.......

THIS JUST IN---NSA TRANSCRIPT----CHUCK SCHUMER ON THE PHONE w/ DNC'S TOM PEREZ:

SCHUMER: "For crissake, Perez.....Ossoff is running around Georgia talking w/ a New England accent."

PEREZ: "Elijah Cummings said Ossoff is another JFK......we had to do something."

SCHUMER: "Those cotton-pickin' black boys dont know s**t from Shinola. And this front-page picture of Ossoff ordering Boston clam chowder in a Georgia tea room. why cant Ossoff order Peach Cobbler like every decent southerner?"

PEREZ: "Chuck, I cant help it if the media did not publish Ossoff's Cuber policy."

SCHUMER: "Cuber Policy my Aunt Tilly. Ossoff loses by getting fewer votes than a candidate who doesn't even exist. And I'm gonna shrink-wrap your *** like a burrito and ship you back to Mexico COD, you mush-mouthed latino loser."

4 posted on 06/24/2017 4:10:01 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Remember about a hundred and fifty years ago when most of the folks in Georgia hated carpetbaggers with a passion? And would do nasty things to them if they got a chance?

Well, I reckon 55% of them still don’t much like them, but stopped short of the Tar, Feathers and running outta town on a rail that carpetbagger Ossoff deserved.


5 posted on 06/24/2017 4:15:13 AM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
This week, the special election to replace Price was held. Republican Karen Handel defeated Democrat Jon Ossoff, 52 to 48... Because Ossoff had positioned himself as a centrist, running mainly on a platform of reducing government spending, a lot of heated debate is now occurring among Democrats.

That is interesting. I heard some Democrat hack (could have been Pe-lousy) claiming that the Republican victory in this race was a Pyrrhic victory. (Note: I don't think she knows what "Pyrrhic victory" means--it wasn't the Republicans throwing everything they had at this race.) The reality of this loss is far worse for the Dems than the media let on--not only did they throw buckets of money at this race, but the candidate had to present himself as something he almost certainly is not in order to get as many votes as he did.

It must be a bad time to be a DemocRAT. Their voting base lives in a few urban pockets, mostly on the coasts. They cannot become more rational or start promoting policies to advance freedom, prosperity, compassion, or anything else that normal people support, because their core base won't accept it and the Republicans already promote those policies (at least to get elected). They can lie about who they are, but that strategy is losing effectiveness since they no longer own the news distribution, thanks to the internet.

Wouldn't it be nice if elections were about selecting the candidates best qualified to get specific jobs done, instead of candidates that advance or impede a socialist juggernaut agenda?

6 posted on 06/24/2017 4:23:28 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

Because Ossoff had positioned himself as a centrist, running mainly on a platform of reducing government spending.......


Yeah, sure, right. Anyone who actually believed this whopper failed the idiot test.


7 posted on 06/24/2017 4:25:13 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

At least Rodney Stooksbury had an address in the district even if he was never at home or answered the door. :)


8 posted on 06/24/2017 4:26:37 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

“But why weren’t they running people long before that?”

Actually it comes down to this, and both parties do it:

If you run a credible candidate against Price that you’re convinced is going to lose anyway, then Price cannot afford to take chances - so he fires up his campaign to get out the vote. When those people vote for Price, they also vote for Trump, along with most or all of the other Republicans.

So it’s a (perfectly legal) way of suppressing the Republican vote a bit, and possibly keeping Trump from winning the state, or other Republicans on the ticket from winning close races.

As we saw in the last election, all it would have taken was a relative handful of districts in PA, WI, and MI where the Dem in Congress felt that he needed to whip up his people to vote...just for the sake of that little Dem in Congress - but quite possibly, that would have flipped those states.


9 posted on 06/24/2017 4:30:15 AM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

Rodney’s wiki entry is short and amusing. website n/a

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodney_Stooksbury


10 posted on 06/24/2017 4:33:17 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

12 posted on 06/24/2017 4:38:43 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Drastically improving on the Stooksbury numbers should be no dazzling feat. (Although, somewhat hilariously, Stooksbury actually got more total votes than Ossoff, 124,917 to Ossoff’s 124,893. Granted, special elections have lower turnout, but good grief.)

Great find! Thanks for posting.

14 posted on 06/24/2017 4:51:17 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

I have a question. If you are the dims in GA 6 and you want to run a ghost candidate what would you have to do? I assume file papers to run and presumably have someone sign them. Now given who they ran for POTUS this is nothing for them but it might have proved awkward if by some fluke the ghost dim had won.


18 posted on 06/24/2017 5:00:53 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Democratic voter fraud in the 6th during the presidential election? I know the 6th very well and cant believe Trump only won by 1%. The no name guy won due to Hillary coattails from illegal votes.
19 posted on 06/24/2017 5:02:42 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

Enjoy the Ossoff voters' reaction all over again


22 posted on 06/24/2017 5:09:28 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

In an era of fake news it is only appropriate there be fake candidates.

This story points out how pathetic journalism has become. In 2016 apparently not one reporter from the Atlanta newspaper or local television stations, including PBS, sought to obtain an interview from the Democrat candidate running against Tom Price. Atlanta is a major city, major media market. If a reporter did seek an interview, and discovered Mr. Stooksbury did not exist, apparently the presence of a ghost candidate was not considered to be newsworthy.

The logical conclusion is political journalists do no real investigative reporting. Perhaps they sit around newsrooms reading press releases from campaigns and talking to party hacks. They then regurgitate what they are spoon fed or write stories outlined by their editors.

If a billionaire purchased a news network, hired real investigative reporters, and turned them loose to write well researched, factual, and non-ideological stories about every dimension of American society that network would dominate news coverage within a few years.

This Current Affairs article represents the type of journalism we used to receive in newspapers and magazines before the media became propaganda outlets for the progressive movement.


23 posted on 06/24/2017 5:11:57 AM PDT by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Over $56 million was spent in total, enough to prevent nearly 17,000 children from dying of malaria.

Does America have a malaria problem I haven't heard about?

24 posted on 06/24/2017 5:13:59 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

Possibly an alias for Rodney stoaksbury age 61 of Andersonville, Tennessee?


28 posted on 06/24/2017 5:22:08 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

If they are going to put up an imaginary person, how about “George Kaplan”? (North by Northwest reference)


33 posted on 06/24/2017 6:00:02 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

This “ghost” trick is nothing new. Fifty or sixty years ago lawyers and others would run for public office, not to win, but just to get name recognition out there. Most of the time there was never a photo of such candidates.

One got the scare of his life when he almost won and election.


36 posted on 06/24/2017 7:23:33 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

I see this as an opportunity for Democrats. Because both Hillary and Elizabeth Warren are effectively unelectable for POTUS, they should run Rodney Stooksbury for POTUS, with either Warren or Hillary for VP.

They could get some of their Silicon Valley billionaires to make a computer generated Stooksbury, and get their lickspittle MSM to crank out tons of fake news positive press for him, going full nineteen-eighty-four.

Then California could pass a law permitting VR candidates to run for POTUS, and get the 9th Circuit to agree that it is perfectly constitutional, delaying it going to the SCOTUS as long as possible.

Of course if they won, Sooksbury would immediately resign and give the office to either Hildebeast or Fauxcahontus.

The bottom line is that this scheme would probably have better odds than any of the multitude of the current schemes they have right now.


37 posted on 06/24/2017 7:28:59 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Baizuo" A derogatory term the Chinese are using to describe America's naive "White Left")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson