In other words, the ban stays in effect????
No. The oppostite. Trump's request for stay of the 4th and 9th Circuit orders was granted. I'm waiting for a report on what "in part" consists of.
No. The oppostite. Trump's request for stay of the 4th and 9th Circuit orders was granted. I'm waiting for a report on what "in part" consists of.
"We leave the injunctions entered by the lower courts in place with respect to respondents and those similarly situated."So this means that the government can enforce the travel ban with regard to people who don't have a relationship to the United States, but not with regard to the named challengers or people like them -- for example, who have relatives who want to come.
No. The oppostite. Trump's request for stay of the 4th and 9th Circuit orders was granted. I'm waiting for a report on what "in part" consists of.
On the stay in part: "We grant the Government's applications to stay the injunctions" blocking the implementation of the ban "to the extent the injunctions prevent enforcement of Section 2(c)" -- the provision suspending entry from six countries -- "with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.""We leave the injunctions entered by the lower courts in place with respect to respondents and those similarly situated."
So this means that the government can enforce the travel ban with regard to people who don't have a relationship to the United States, but not with regard to the named challengers or people like them -- for example, who have relatives who want to come.
Here's some more language from the travel ban decision: The court emphasizes that the travel ban affects the challengers who want their relatives to come to the US, as well as -- for example -- the students who want to attend the University of Hawaii.