I didn't know that. That makes another separate bullet point.
They actually look at his lack of threats in May-June as disculpatory, instead of as evidence of an attack plan, and a desire not to put the heat onto himself.
That kind of deductive reasoning leaves me nearly speechless.
"The 9-11 hi-jackers didn't have a plan as evidenced by the lack of any prior attack on the WTC."
Oh, wait, ... bad example. Uhh, OK, here it is...
"The 1993 bombing of the WTC wasn't planned as evidenced by the lack of any prior attack on the WTC."
“We think they were not planning the 9-11 attack in the last few months, because they stopped putting violent threats on social media in the last few months.”
Choose one:
Faking Bogus Investigations
Famous But Incompetent.
(Dear FBI: We invite you to join in and opine.)