Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delingpole: Tesla Car Batteries Not Remotely Green, Study Finds
Breitbart.com ^ | 21 Jun 2017 | James Delingpole

Posted on 06/21/2017 5:50:03 PM PDT by Rockitz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Stopthethreat

See my post#8...


21 posted on 06/21/2017 6:49:38 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: infool7
Tesla went on to develop a wireless power distribution system that he hoped would be capable of transmit power long distance directly into homes and factories. Early on he seemed to borrow from the ideas of Mahlon Loomis,[120][121] proposing a system composed of balloons to suspend transmitting and receiving electrodes in the air above 30,000 feet (9,100 m) in altitude, where he thought the pressure would allow him to send high voltages (millions of volts) long distances. To further study the conductive nature of low pressure air he set up a test facility at high altitude in Colorado Springs during 1899.[122][123][124] Experiments he conducted there with a large coil operating in the megavolts range, as well as observations he made of the electronic noise of lightning strikes, led him to incorrectly conclude[125][115] that he could use the entire globe of the Earth to conduct electrical energy.

The theory included driving alternating current pulses into the Earth at its resonant frequency from a grounded Tesla coil working against an elevated capacitance to make the potential of the Earth oscillate. Tesla thought this would allowing alternating current to be received with a similar capacitive antenna tuned to resonance it at any point on Earth with very little power loss.[126][127][128] His observations also led him to believe a high voltage used in a coil at an elevation of a few hundred feet would “break the air stratum down”, eliminating the need for miles of cable hanging on balloons to create his atmospheric return circuit.[129][130] Tesla would go on the next year to propose a “World Wireless System” that was to broadcast both information and power worldwide[131][132] and attempted in 1901 to construct a large high-voltage wireless power station, now called the Wardenclyffe Tower, at Shoreham, New York. By 1904 investment dried up and the facility was never completed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transfer

22 posted on 06/21/2017 6:55:18 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ( Mr. Comey, did you engage in or know of ANY OTHER leaks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

THAT would be almost as good as a Mr. Fusion to power the car.


23 posted on 06/21/2017 7:21:05 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

24 posted on 06/21/2017 7:21:19 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

a very expensive hoax that diverts $$$$$$$$$$$$$ and brain power down the rabbit hole... pretty clever of those smartie pants who hate humanity ....


25 posted on 06/21/2017 7:22:00 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Elon Musk getting rich sucking off the government teat....pulling the wool over stupid people’s eyes


26 posted on 06/21/2017 7:30:02 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

“... because it is a meta-analysis (ie a summary) of all the available studies on the subject. “

A proper meta-analysis is much more than a mere “summary”. A meta analysis involves using sophisticated statistical analysis to aggregate the findings of several studies — thus (amongst other things) greatly reducing the margin of error.

Assuming (1) the meta-analysis was done right, and (2) the initial studies were done right — then, these results are far more telling than a mere “summary” would have been.


27 posted on 06/21/2017 7:32:41 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
And that doesn't take into consideration the mining of the lithium ore by fossil fuel equipment, made from steel in a fossil fueled factory. It also doesn't account for the fossil fuel based transportation from the mine site to the extraction facilities - electrified with fossil based fuel. And of course, the construction materials and components that comprise the Tesla factory, all from fossil based materials, from manufacturing sites using equipment made by fossil fuel based equipment.

But for fossil fuels, "green" energy cannot exist.

28 posted on 06/21/2017 7:37:08 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Wouldn’t a true Tesla car run on wireless transmission of energy?

Or a tank full of ball lightning.

29 posted on 06/21/2017 7:37:44 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

doesn’t matter really; intent is the only thing that matters to libs, not actual results.


30 posted on 06/21/2017 7:54:47 PM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

PT Barnum would be proud.


31 posted on 06/21/2017 8:00:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

““Prius drivers are now “Global Warming Deniers”!”

Demiers? Why, they are murdering the planet!”

Well, when these self-appointed “stewards of the environment” drive 45mph in the fast lane, they are in a sense “murdering” all of us.


32 posted on 06/21/2017 8:03:12 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Older Prius vehicles have a battery that is only 1.3 KWh, so probably have a lower carbon footprint than a Tesla battery. I’m not sure if they take into account the fact that you have to mine the minerals to build the battery and refine/ship them to the factory. The battery can’t just be tossed Into a landfill when it wears out. You have to recycle or dispose properly.


33 posted on 06/21/2017 8:06:33 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

When you get that much cash from the taxpayers, it’s sure green though!


34 posted on 06/22/2017 5:30:49 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson