... Roger Vinson wrote in his ruling: “But, the law is the law.” ...
-
Nowhere in the article does it say what “law” he is referring to.
the judge is establishing a religion for the state.
the plaintiffs are a religion of atheism organization.
After the war, when we beat the totalitarians, let’s put the crosses back.
Where is the lawsuit to prevent Muzzies from praying in a PUBLIC STREET?
How can we “deport” such judges.
When he says “the law” is really ONLY talking about an errant judicial interpretation of the Bill of Rights and with it a misinterpretation of “separation of Church and state”, which is NOT in the Constitution.
The First Amendment reads: “CONGRESS shall make no law REGARDING the establishment of religion …”
The Constitution only prohibits the Federal government from legislating on the question of religion. Congress can no more prohibit the states from establishing religion as they can in mandating it. The question is reserved to the states. The Federal courts and Federal legislation should have no jurisdiction on the question.
If it had been a 24 foot star of david would it have been alright?
So basically what this and similar court rulings are doing is establishing atheism as the State religion of the United States government in violation of the Constitutional intent.
Which “law” does the cross violate?
While we are wasting lives and money in overseas adventures, the Republic and its foundations are being demolished.
“If the cross under review in Rabun County violated the First Amendment and had to be removed, the cross here must suffer the same fate,”
Really? You guys create and strike down laws at will...The rulings saying the crosses must come down have no actual laws attached...just interpretations of a letter by Jefferson.
You could have found the earlier ruling flawed.
If you had the true courage of your convictions and a set of ballz.
A very old, very tired tactic of the evil one...
“Your foes have roared in the midst of your meeting place;
they set up their own signs for signs.
They were like those who swing axes
in a forest of trees.
And all its carved wood
they broke down with hatchets and hammers.
They set your sanctuary on fire;
they profaned the dwelling place of your name,
bringing it down to the ground.
They said to themselves, “We will utterly subdue them”;
they burned all the meeting places of God in the land.”
Psalm 74 (of Asaph)
The Law is the Law but tradition, history and culture are tradition, history and culture and when law conflicts with the latter, the law should be changed and juridical decrees that border on the ludicrous like this, ignored.
To the Judge, a hearty Bronx cheer. To the city, contact your local veterans group and biker clubs and ask if they will volunteer for guard duty.
Hubby grew up in Pensacola. Wonder if he knows he’s been scarred for life. Maybe he could get reparations. Who do we sue? /s
Satan inspired U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson wrote in his twisted, warped, and incorrect ruling that his version of the law is the law.
Make the judge “disappear”!
A Reagan Judge appointee
https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/vinson-clyde-roger
Vinson, Clyde Roger
Born 1940 in Cadiz, KY
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on September 9, 1983, to a seat vacated by Lynn C. Higby. Confirmed by the Senate on October 4, 1983, and received commission on October 5, 1983. Served as chief judge, 1997-2004. Assumed senior status on March 31, 2005.
Other Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, 2006-2013
Education:
U.S. Naval Academy, B.S., 1962
Vanderbilt University Law School, J.D., 1971
Professional Career:
U.S. Navy lieutenant, 1962-1968
Private practice, Pensacola, Florida, 1971-1983
???? But the FBI can be sent to symposiums held by CAIR to learn Muslim sensitivity training?
Annie Gaylor. Remember that name.
L