Posted on 06/18/2017 7:22:25 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
We received an email from a Navy Mother that raises serious questions. We will redact her name, while the rumors (and that’s how they must be categorized for now) reported by her son aboard the Fitzgerald are checked out. Here is what she wrote to us:
*snip*My son is assigned to the USS Fitzgerald. I am unable to share his rate with you.
The information is short and not so sweet. The implications are disturbing.
The ship is registered in the Philippines. We do not know who the owner is. The container ship neither had its running lights or transponder on. That is an action taken willfully. Furthermore, for the container ship to strike with such accuracy is troublesome. Given what some have done with cars in Europe, what a feather in the cap it would be to sink a U.S. Navy warship. Think on that.
My son missed being washed out to sea by the blink of an eye. He was on his way to one of the berthing areas that was rammed.
If there is any substance to this – that the ACX Crystal disabled protective systems and rammed the Fitzgerald at high speed aimed at crtical facilities (evident from the damage) –
PHOTOS
…we have to consider the possibility of an asymmetric warfare attack designed to disable missile defense of a carrier strike group, as North Korea demonstrates the ability to make exactly such attacks on a multibillion dollar warship carrying thousands of sailors.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Enemy islamism until demonstrated otherwise.
Also reported on heavy.com is the U-turn the cargo ship made:
Facts? pffft. Since when have we cared about facts?
It is apparent from the damage photos that the collision was at an oblique angle, and both ships were on similar heading at the time of collision, sort of like a collision on a highway when making a lane change. Not like a head on or t-bone collision.
I suspect negligence on the bridge of the Fitzgerald because there was apparently no collision horn sounded. It should have been sounded minutes before the collision and at a minimum the captain should have been on the bridge. I take negligence (or far less likely, malice) on the part of the commercial vessel for granted.
There has to be more to this story.
I guess it’s easier to believe they saw it coming right towards them on radar and let it happen.
Whoever it was, he just became Captain Crunch.
I strongly question that this “mother” received email from her son. Any time there is an incident like this, the ship goes into what they call “River City” and all email/internet access is immediately secured to all but only the highest-ranking sailors (generally the “Triad” of CO, XO and CMC).
I have lots of problems with this account. Yes, civilian ship radars work with transponders. They also register objects without transponders.
A MILITARY ship's radar necessarily works in an environment where hostile ships do not helpfully have transponders on. As a matter of fact, I would HOPE that the ship's sensor software would flag a ship with transponder off as "POTENTIAL HOSTILE"!
Must be conspiracy day. My first thought after the initial reporting: How are our ships supposed to defend against modern warships if a freighter can just accidentally torpedo a destroyer?
totaally fishy.
That destroyer will have equipment to detect if you tossed a Popsicle stick in the water in front of it.
Was the captain "smoking a rope"?
Unless it had help.
Open ocean, not some crowded port or crappy weather.
I did see The USS Eisenhower, returning to Norfolk, on 29 August 1988, she collided with an anchored Spanish coal ship while entering the harbor to dock at Norfolk Naval Station when wind and currents pushed the carrier off course, although damage was minor to both ships.
There are pictures in other threads showing the cargo ships track. How would that track be available if the transponder was off?
Nothing gets a boat driver’s attention more than radar reporting a CBDR target.
They get apoplectic over it. Unless the DD’s radar was down, something was up with the container ship.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.