Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proust; All

Can someone familiar with container ships explain the two weird u-turns the container ship is reported to have made?

I know next to nothing about container ships - but the little I know suggests that they do not usually maneuver like this.

Could it be a deliberate effort to take out one of our destroyers? Inquiring minds are definitely curious about this, and no longer trusts the MSM to report the truth.


39 posted on 06/17/2017 7:54:29 PM PDT by jacquej ("You cannot have a conservative government with a liberal culture." (Mark Steyn))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: jacquej

Could it be a deliberate effort to take out one of our destroyers? Inquiring minds are definitely curious about this, and no longer trusts the MSM to report the truth.

Doesn't matter. If our state of the art fleet can't fend off a 29,000 ton (58 million pound) lumbering container ship, we should just discharge the sailors, sink the ships, and spend our money on something useful.


49 posted on 06/17/2017 8:04:55 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jacquej

Judging from the AIS track and common practices in merchant vessels, the ship was on autopilot, almost certainly with no one on the bridge. On feeling the impact, someone said “Hey! we hit something!” and went up to the bridge to check it out. They eventually got the autohelm disconnected and turned the ship around to return to the scene. Just surmise on my part, but a plausible explanation.


209 posted on 06/18/2017 8:32:33 AM PDT by Chuckster ("Them Rag Heads just ain't rational" Curly Bartley 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson