Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2

Same as with the Porter. They probably thought they could pass in front until the last moment, then tried to turn away. If ACX Crystal’s bridge was negligently unattended, it would have done nothing to avoid the collision. Fitzgerald may have been able to turn far enough to make it a glancing blow that only contacted the container ship’s port bow.

Also, a correction to my last post: If it had been a deliberate attack at 17:30 UTC, that means they had remained in the area for an hour and a half afterwards, not just a half hour.


258 posted on 06/19/2017 7:49:24 AM PDT by happytpr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]


To: happytpr
There is some information we are not getting that would explain all this. That is why I am taking the devil's advocate position. When the media first started passing this story on, it said the Fitzgerald RAMMED the ACX Crystal.

Since it is obvious that is not what happened, why would they state that in the articles ?

260 posted on 06/19/2017 5:03:46 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson