Your choice of vocabulary expression proves my point. Therefore I will engage no further.
Now CAWW, I think you are being a bit disingenuous.
The person took exception to your statement that seemed to equate Rush L. and Ann C. with the left in stirring violent actions up. Do really believe that?
If so , well then you have to expect a wee bit of derisive comments. Here is the thing: The right, at least to my knowledge as never celebrated the radicals assigned to their side. When Timothy McVeigh was put down, not one on the rightside defended him. The left does not seem to see their own side that way, while Bernie S. deplored what the shooter did, a lot of the left is blaming his actions on the right. They have never disavowed the folks on their side like the weathermen. They are the ones pushing political violence since the summer of 2016, not the right who have been trying to use the political system to get redress of grievance. Trying to be a right wing moderate in such circumstances ,means you will be endlessly attacking you own side to no conceivable end.
The simple fact is you cannot reduce tensions with someone who will not question his own motives or is absolutely sure of their own world view. The left thinks they can undo this election, to being in a glorious period of socialist......something. What they are doing is preventing the pendulum from shifting the nation back to something reasonable with compromises that both sides will be unhappy with, but livable for all. What they are doing is pushing the country, by their intrigues to a civil war.
Publically noting this is a service, not an indication the Rush L. or Ann C. are advocating violence.