To: sukhoi-30mki
The Bronco is the perfect close air support weapon for the war on terror.
The A-10 is way too expensive to waste on wasting a hand full of Jihadi setting an ambush for our troops.
I have never understood why the Air Force did not pull several hundred out of DM storage and refurbish them for use in Afghanistan and Iraq
2 posted on
06/12/2017 12:39:16 AM PDT by
rdcbn
To: sukhoi-30mki
Send in some Negrito aborigines; fights over tomorrow. They are deadly silent with their blowguns.
3 posted on
06/12/2017 12:58:15 AM PDT by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
To: sukhoi-30mki; Jet Jaguar
While it is encouraging to see the OV-10 still in service somewhere (Philippines), it is also true that it was first produced in 1965 (production stopped in the 80s). In our modern era, aircraft that are 60, 60, and even 70 years old are employed by air forces.
In the US, our KC-135s and B-52s were first produced in the 1950s. The B-52s are scheduled to fly another few decades.
This would be akin to fighting WW II with equipment from the 1870s.
At some point, this madness has to stop. We spend Trillions on welfare and give aways.
7 posted on
06/12/2017 3:57:49 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: sukhoi-30mki
From the article,
“general purpose bombs”
no need to even read the directions on that package wrapper!
To: sukhoi-30mki
Widow Maker
Used the same (physically, not by Stock Number) wheel bearings as the M151 Jeep. I kept a few Jeeps off the Deadline report with them.
9 posted on
06/12/2017 4:32:05 AM PDT by
Feckless
(The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I have been wondering for some time why spend money on either the Tucano or the T-6 Coin variant when the answer is sitting in the desert at Davis Monthan in the form of an OV-10?
I can answer my own question by following the money trail.
11 posted on
06/12/2017 5:20:30 AM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
To: AlexW; Berosus; buwaya; CygnusXI; dadgum; dagogo redux; DFG; Doofer; Fai Mao; knarf; LadyDoc; ...
PIng
13 posted on
06/12/2017 5:48:29 AM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Make US Intelligence great again!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
19 posted on
06/12/2017 7:27:45 AM PDT by
GOYAKLA
(" Winning not Whining"!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The OV-1 had potential as a close support aircraft. Unfortunately, they were an Army aircraft and the Air Force, being stiff-necked about armed fixed-wing aircraft belonging to the Army, we could only use them for recon. I think most all of Mohawks left are in museums. I've seen a few listed for sale but much too rich for me.
21 posted on
06/12/2017 5:36:33 PM PDT by
beelzepug
(Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson