That was no “advance review”, that was direction on the content of the testimony was to give.
And, agreeing with Sekulow, it certainly casts doubt on the impartiality of Mr. Mueller regarding his friend, Comey, who has been running legal interference for the Clintoon Crime Syndicate for many, many years.
Folks, it really looks like the fix is in for this one.
Does it not seem that knowing Mueller’s relationship with Comey that any charges he might bring against President Trump could be overturned or defeated because of that relationship???
It could go all the way to the Supreme Court if need be....
If there was advance review of Comey’s testimony, then Mueller should be fired. There is already strong grounds to question his impartiality regarding Comey and now that we know Comey is a lying self-serving crap-weasel, there is a clear basis for doubting that this investigation will do justice.
“”That was no “advance review”, that was direction on the content of the testimony was to give.””
Why do you say it wasn’t an advance review? Do you think Mueller had it in his possession and never looked at it? Or were you making a facetious remark?
According to Gingrich this morning, he doesn’t like at all who Mueller has brought on board to expand his investigation. Newt said some of these guys have been in trouble before for I think he implied for withholding evidence, whatever, it was a serious charge.
Newt also said anybody who thinks this will be an impartial exercise “is crazy”.
I find it extraordinary that Muellar allowed Comey to testify at all, on Thursday. They’re best friends in the business, after all, mentor and disciple. What ground were they trying to lay out? Were they baiting Trump, on the WH tape possibility?
They're fighting the last war - the Clinton impeachment war.
They really think it's going to go down like that.
They're not counting on a few million p*ssed-ff Trump supporter bees from a thoroughly enraged beehive.