You missed the point.
The questions were aimed at showing the article was devoid of information that implicates Wray in enabling the spread of Sharia.
The questions were written as if standing over the shoulder of the journalist and leading to a conclusion that there is no ‘there’ there in a thesis of Wray as a radical Islamist enabler.
In this context, it should be clear I have very little interest in the answers to the questions. The aim was to destroy the article’s import.
Thank you for the clarification
You may have known your intent but it was not obvious from your post