Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

Well, a reporter asked Trump if he would be willing to testify under oath and tell his side of the story since he called Comey a liar. And of course, Trump says, yes, I would. I have to think his lawyer is none too pleased saying this before discussing it with him. Now Dems will be salivating going for Trump under Oath and asking any question they want to get him in a lie.

I’m sorry, but Trump should have been prepared to answer that question. Trump fell right into the trap again.

He should say, when they bring Lynch and have her testify under oath, along with Obama, then I will think about it.

Trump was vindicated yesterday and today he is willing to let the wolves go for his jugular with any and all questions now under oath.

I don’t care if there are tapes showing Comey lied- what Trump has now opened up is him saying in public that he will testify under oath.


23 posted on 06/09/2017 1:42:29 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Engedi

Nope. The President was extremely prepared to answer that question. I am supremely confident that the fake news media will continue to be very disappointed.


26 posted on 06/09/2017 2:04:02 PM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Engedi

You’re over-dramatizing this. Had Trump said anything but ‘yes,’ to that question, the MSM would have had hysterics. As it is, Trump is obligated to nothing—zilch. He merely dodged another land mine with typical dexterity.


27 posted on 06/09/2017 2:16:31 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Engedi
"Well, a reporter asked Trump if he would be willing to testify under oath and tell his side of the story since he called Comey a liar. And of course, Trump says, yes, I would. I have to think his lawyer is none too pleased saying this before discussing it with him. Now Dems will be salivating going for Trump under Oath and asking any question they want to get him in a lie."

Doesn't this sound like the Tax Returns schtick?

The media have been demanding and waiting for years. Trump will have them apoplectic, spinning their wheels and sputtering once again.

Trump will never be put under oath.

33 posted on 06/09/2017 3:06:28 PM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Engedi
He should say, when they bring Lynch and have her testify under oath, along with Obama, then I will think about it.

The MSM would have portrayed that as a weak response and a dodge. Trump accuses Comey of lying under oath but fails to back it up by equivocating about whether he would say it under oath. So who do you believe?

It must be remembered what the Special Counsel is investigating: Russian meddling with our election and possible collusion of the Trump campaign with the Russians (not a federal crime). So what does it matter if Trump demanded Comey's loyalty or that he may or may not have said to let the Flynn case go? There was no obstruction of justice, otherwise Comey would have reported it at the time. The case continues and if you believe Comey, the investigation of Flynn is not related to the Russian meddling in our election.

I don’t care if there are tapes showing Comey lied- what Trump has now opened up is him saying in public that he will testify under oath.

There are no tapes and that will be confirmed shortly. This is he said, he said. A big nothingberger. The Special Counsel could require Trump to testify under oath no matter what he said. Trump will have his counsel with him.

39 posted on 06/09/2017 8:49:08 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson