New Stanford debate group criticized for giving ‘legitimacy’ to Obamacare repeal

College Fix ^ | June 9, 2017 | Zach Swaim

[C19fan]

Amidst the tense political climate in the country and on campus, Stanford University students have created a group that makes civil discourse a priority.

The Stanford Political Union encourages partisans to debate their differences instead of avoiding and insulting each other.

[C19fan]

Terence Zhao would joined the Red Guards during Mao's Cultural Revolution.

[Nifster]

It’s debate fear cryin out loud

[Amendment10]

All that it takes to kill Obamacare repeal debate is to argue the following excerpts, clarifications of the fed’s constitutionally limited powers by previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices.

• “Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

• "State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

• ”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

But I wouldn’t be surprised if misguided Stanford students have no clue concerning these excerpts.