Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerry Brown Plays President; Signs Climate Deal with China
breitbart.com ^ | 6/7/17 | Joel B. Pollak

Posted on 06/07/2017 12:52:55 PM PDT by ColdOne

The Associated Press reports, however, that the agreement does not bind either China or California to specific greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets.

Brown met for 45 minutes with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The AP reports that “Trump’s announcement last week that he wants to pull out of the Paris accord did not come up, according to the governor.”

Brown’s China visit was not the first time that he has attempted to lead on the world stage. In late 2015, he traveled to Paris — in the immediate aftermath of the San Bernardino terror attack — to participate in the global discussions around the climate change accords that eventually emerged — and which President Trump subsequently rejected.

The governor has also championed California’s role in the “Under2” coalition, a grouping of subnational jurisdictions (such as states and provinces) that have committed to address climate change.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; fakegovernor; fakescience; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Az Joe; All
"Are the States allowed to enter in to “agreements, treaties, etc” with a foreign power?"

Nope.

"Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation[emphasis added]; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

21 posted on 06/07/2017 1:09:31 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

What next, turn San Diego and Coronado over to the Chinese for naval base?


22 posted on 06/07/2017 1:09:39 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Again it disapeared? Damn cursor is in cahoots with the tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

Explicitly forbidden by the Constitution. Article 1 Section 10:

https://usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec10.html


23 posted on 06/07/2017 1:09:44 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

Article I Section 10 of the US Constitution reads...

Section 10 - The Text
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Section 10 - The Meaning
Article I, Section 10, limits the power of the states. States may not enter into a treaty with a foreign nation; that power is given to the president, with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate present. States cannot make their own money, nor can they grant any title of nobility.

As is Congress, states are prohibited from passing laws that assign guilt to a specific person or group without court proceedings (bills of attainder), that make something illegal retroactively(ex post facto laws) or that interfere with legal contracts.

No state, without approval from Congress, may collect taxes on imports or exports, build an army or keep warships in times of peace, nor otherwise engage in war unless invaded or in imminent danger.


24 posted on 06/07/2017 1:10:05 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts (If Republicans are not prepared to carry on the Revolution of 1776, prepare for a communist takeover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

This is just red-meat for the moonbats.

Jerry can sign deals just like the Carolina’s can sign deals.


25 posted on 06/07/2017 1:10:55 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

An hour later Brown wanted to do another treaty


26 posted on 06/07/2017 1:12:16 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

So, a communist state signs an agreement with a communist country. Did I miss anything else? Oh, the people of California are now slaves of the state


27 posted on 06/07/2017 1:14:41 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

The word “Deal” is a key operative.

Until I see it, this is a nothing-burger.

I have been putting in manufacturing all over the south owned by Chinese. I will guarantee there is a “deal” there somewhere.


28 posted on 06/07/2017 1:14:47 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Jerry’s been Shanghaied.


29 posted on 06/07/2017 1:16:14 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

You are correct. It pretty much takes away all private insurance in the state. So those of us who are tied to life insurance and retirement benefit plans just got screwed. The Dictatorship of Sacramento is dictating to us what we can and can’t have. No different than what Hugo Chavez or Maduro did in Venezuela. Next he’ll nationalized all corps and businesses. Its coming.


30 posted on 06/07/2017 1:17:43 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

People like Jerry Brown are the reason I want to get the hell out of California.


31 posted on 06/07/2017 1:23:59 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Nothing binding. Just agreeing they are commie socialist bretheren.


32 posted on 06/07/2017 1:24:51 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

States cannot sign “treaties”
But he can make business deals he thinks benefit California - only


33 posted on 06/07/2017 1:29:21 PM PDT by silverleaf (We voted for change, not leftover change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

HAHAHA! Good one!


34 posted on 06/07/2017 1:30:26 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy; sanjuanbob

realcleanguy wrote:

“You are correct. It pretty much takes away all private insurance in the state. So those of us who are tied to life insurance and retirement benefit plans just got screwed. The Dictatorship of Sacramento is dictating to us what we can and can’t have. No different than what Hugo Chavez or Maduro did in Venezuela. Next he’ll nationalized all corps and businesses. Its coming.”

Retirement benefit plans’ healthcare?

The healthcare offered by those retirement plans is already too expensive.


35 posted on 06/07/2017 1:37:00 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

All them faults must be generating strong magnetic currents that are scrambling the Kalifornians’ brains....


36 posted on 06/07/2017 1:37:57 PM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Not really, I retired with a good plan and a low deductible so, now it will go away. I wonder if we will lose the doctors we currently see or will they relocated out of state now?


37 posted on 06/07/2017 1:40:37 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
Are the States allowed to enter in to “agreements, treaties, etc” with a foreign power?

The US Constitution expressly forbids that!

38 posted on 06/07/2017 1:55:21 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Chinese leadership was probably laughing like crazy at stupid Brown.

Their map of the hundred year plan probably has California as a Chinese province.


39 posted on 06/07/2017 1:56:26 PM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

Yep....major tax hike for single payer. Guess for who? Not citizens who have to pay those taxes. They also just passed a law if you cannot afford to pay your traffic ticket, they will let it go. Guess who benefits from that too? The invaders.


40 posted on 06/07/2017 2:01:16 PM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson