Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimRed
But the nuke does not need frequent refueling.

The rest of the CVBG is unrepping for fuel every 4 days so there is little benefit that the CVN doesn't have to too. A conventional A/C carrier can sustain much more battle damage and still propel itself than a CVN. For that reason alone conventional is much better.

57 posted on 06/07/2017 9:21:01 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

That is in the realm of theory. A nuclear A/C has never been damaged in combat. So you are speaking theoretically, not based on actual experience.


61 posted on 06/07/2017 1:34:41 PM PDT by Bull Snipe (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson