They are now praising a bobby who confronted the terrorists in the first moments “with only a baton” (which was brave indeed), and the officer got stabbed for his trouble, but they can’t seem to ask themselves how much better it would have been if that bobby had a gun!!!!!
Think about it, Londoners, a brave officer was in the scene as the first seconds of the attacks unfolded, but HE HAD NO GUN.
He could have ended the terrorists very quickly IF HE HAD A GUN.
Pretty bad when just about anyone in Arizona can be better prepared to stop a terrorist attack than a bobby in London, using this: