What’s sad about the court rulings is that Trump could have said, “I don’t think Muslims are compatible with the US and create a danger to our country” and issued an order that he would exclude them from the US under the law. It didn’t matter what he said on the stump, or whether it was a Muslim ban (it wasn’t). But the lower courts brought in a constituional aspect to it that doesn’t apply to foreigners. Ridiculous, and it will be slapped down thoroughly and persuasively, but the press won’t report it accurately and the stupid democrats won’t understand anything other than that a conservative court ruled that Trump can ban muslims and be a bad person.
What aspect was that? Religious freedom applies to everyone in the US, not just to citizens. I agree the religious freedom argument is unjustified in this case, but not because the case is about foreigners.