Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

He was elected on economic issues. No need to discuss the science which is unsettled.


2 posted on 06/03/2017 8:38:01 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein

Exactly


12 posted on 06/03/2017 8:47:04 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein

“He was elected on economic issues. No need to discuss the science which is unsettled.”

indeed. trump’s speech made that powerfully clear: the “agreement” had nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with ham-stringing the U.S. economically and transferring wealth and jobs from the U.S. to others.

If the agreement was really about the environment, then the biggest polluters on the planet, namely China and India, would have been subject to the same terms as everyone else and not given a free ride to pollute more than the rest of the world combined.

so absolutely no need to argue the “science”.


26 posted on 06/03/2017 11:28:27 AM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson