Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

My contention in regard to the Bundy case all along has been that the Fed Gov is just tightening it’s grip on public lands. Think about it. Almost since the time of the Louisiana Purchase most of the land has been almost worthless. Sure folks have made fortunes in mining and ranching but the value per acre for scores and scores of years has been “dirt”.

In recent years that value has started to rise for a number of different reasons. One other thing to rise has been public debt. IMHO, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to draw a straight line from one to the other. Since public land is what is the security on public debt, clear title has to be established. When that land largely had little value no one cared that ranchers eked out a minimal living on it. When it had little value and was pretty hard to get to no one cared what miners did.

The states out west are going to have a hard time wresting rights to it from the Fed Gov, IMHO.


4 posted on 06/03/2017 2:00:24 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

Instead of gold our money should be pegged to land.


5 posted on 06/03/2017 2:08:29 AM PDT by mindburglar (When Superman and Batman fight, the only winner is crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

Makes sense, for years you could get approval for improvements on BLM lands, they were actually encouraged but not since Obama.


16 posted on 06/03/2017 6:39:25 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson