Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Circuit Finds Class of Independent Truckers Excluded From Federal Arbitration Act
Lexology ^ | May 29, 2017 | Arbitration Nation

Posted on 05/31/2017 4:16:55 AM PDT by Mechanicos

Mr. Oliveira brought a putative class action suit against the interstate trucking company for which he worked–Prime–for violating the Fair Labor Standards Act, Missouri minimum wage statute, and other labor laws. Prime moved to compel arbitration under the FAA. In response, Plaintiffs argued that the FAA had no application to their contracts because they are transportation workers.

[The Court agreed with the Truckers]

(Excerpt) Read more at lexology.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arbitration; courts; transportation; truckers
This is big win for Transportation workers, Mandatory Arbitration often is not good for the little guys.
1 posted on 05/31/2017 4:16:55 AM PDT by Mechanicos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos

I’m no big fan of minimum wages; I think free markets should take care of themselves, but I’m also against giving anyone a market advantage - such as a union which creates a contract for less than minimum wages, typically permitted under many state minimum wage laws.

The ‘gig economy’ independent contractor loophole is another one; Lyft for example pays $6.70 an hour after commission.

If you’re going to stand in the way of the economy, you should require everyone to get in the same line and not create winners and losers through arbitrary laws.


2 posted on 05/31/2017 4:42:08 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos
Mandatory Arbitration often is not good for the little guys.

That's because arbitrators tend to stick to the terms of the contract both parties willingly signed, whereas judges have to bend with the political winds.

3 posted on 05/31/2017 5:07:03 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos

This is an amazing example of the byzantine nature of modern law. The truckers are arguing on the one hand that they are employees, not independent contractors, and so are entitled to the protection of the Fair Labor Standards Act. At the same time they are arguing that they are indeed independent contractors and as such are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act. The difference presumable is they way each act defines independent contractors.


4 posted on 05/31/2017 5:12:33 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu; Mechanicos

>
If you’re going to stand in the way of the economy, you should require everyone to get in the same line and not create winners and losers through arbitrary laws.
>

Well, how ELSE are you going to grow the judicial/lawyer class, revolving door of litigation, than through arbitrary ‘laws’ that are purposefully so.

I mean, if the elected made sound, non-conflicting, succinct Law, they’d put themselves out of biz (as it were). /s


5 posted on 05/31/2017 7:16:12 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I read the summary, have a Ph.D., and have no idea what it means.

Can you explain?


6 posted on 05/31/2017 8:43:27 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson