Posted on 05/29/2017 10:22:06 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
They have destroyed and discredited the social sciences and they are now taking aim at doing the same to the STEM curriculum"
What we all have to watch out for is the time when engineers who graduate from these feminized intersectional non-Newtonian STEM courses start designing machines like airplanes and elevators that are supposed to function in the real world.
Climbing into an elevator (for example) on the 95th floor of the John Hancock Building in Chicago that is based on socially sensitized non-Euro-centric Common Core Feminist math might prove to be a jarring experience given that the Earth on which it stands was put in place before this new reality was discovered. Its gravitational field is real Chauvinistic and Reactionary dontchaknow.
Coming soon: Eradicating all oppressive, white concepts of medicine and embracing the cancer-crushing powers of .... voodoo!
If she can show me an advanced Physics degree, I will listen.
O! Wait! She can’t! She’s a professor of LBGT studies!
‘These structures of classification, such as male/female, or living/non-living, are “hierarchical and exploitative” and are thusly “part of the apparatus that enables oppression.”
living/non living
so dead people are “hierarchical and exploitative” and are not dead just part of the apparatus that enables oppression...
you get that? even dying is enabling oppression...
hahahahhahahaha...man you really cant make this up
They are inventing new sciences to support the new world in which they live.
They have already reinvented the language.
The math, chemistry and physics are easy-peasey after that.
All they have to do now is to convince the natural world to conform to their new reality.
(That may prove a tad more difficult than getting a GubMint study grant.)
Since she dislikes Newton so much, let’s see what she can do about that whole male centric gravity thing.
“...“For instance, in many ‘official’ feminist histories of the United States, black/African American women’s organizing and writing are completely unaccounted for before the 1973 creation of the middle-class, professional National Black Feminist Organization,” Stark writes.
This happened because of “the frequent subsuming of intersectional identities under supposedly encompassing meta-identities,” namely, the tendency for black feminist resistance efforts to be subsumed under the broader category of feminism.
Therefore, the efforts of black feminists were often denied legitimacy within the popular press — all due to black women’s classification within binary hierarchies that privileged white women and whiteness, and therefore negated black women’s existence and efforts.
Stark also argues that by “deprioritizing” privileged people, “safer spaces” could be created for minorities. She gives the example of “deprioritizing” herself.
“For instance, I, being white, should not be in all spaces, positions of authority, or meetings,” she said, because her presence could “stall” movements towards progress...”
PROGRESS TOWARDS WHAT EXACTLY?
Someone here apply for a grant to study the discriminatory nature of gravity. It is obviously biased against fat folk.
Once Alan Sokal solved the gravity problem, intersectionality in physics is child’s play.
Utter nonsense.
Yeah, right. Given her major, I doubt that she has the mathematical ability to grasp even the most basic concepts of quantum theory, much less devise a testable hypothesis of “intersectional quantum physics” that has a better potential of describing the real world than quantum physics theory does.
I’ll bet she thinks she’s really smart, too, because she can toss together a word salad like nobody’s business.
Not insane; they have to create “female-friendly” STEM material to make it easier for women. They just won’t accept that many women don’t want to work in those fields; they don’t want to slave away like the men already doing it.
“Trofim Lysenko, please pick up the nearest white courtesy phone.”
It’s much worse than that. We have whole departments in our universities that are training people to be bat guano crazy.
It’s not going to end well if it continues on the present course.
>> It is the prototypical example of the dense , jargon heavy content lite “scholarship” totally devoid of any fact or reality based intellectual or scholarly work product.
AKA polysyllabic academic gobbledygook. Word salad.
Feminazis have moved on from looking for the gay gene to investigating the gay atom.
Schrodinger’s cat lady....
_________________
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH!
So good, I wish I’d written that!!!
Kudos.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.