Posted on 05/26/2017 11:15:12 AM PDT by C19fan
Thank God that 2/3 of Millennials don’t think that safe spaces are absolutely necessary.
“And we won World War II how?”
“Because men were still men then, not gender confused emotional little snowflakes. We’d certainly NOT win today. This country still produces some fine, patriotic men, many of whom are serving today...but not nearly enough! “
First, you get your snowflake divisions (including the female-to-male trans characters). You fatten them up with nice, generous meals ahead of time, and a nice and cozy bed. Then, when you get them into the theater of operations, you gently drive them to the front lines in specially-prepared buses or (for the officers) cars, maybe even giving them a hot chocolate if it is a little nippy outside. Then you let the Russkies, Chinese, Norks or Iranians absolutely clobber them...and, in the process, run out of ammo. Then the real men get inserted into the combat zone and crush our enemies.
See how easy it is!
Damn! Why didn’t I think of that? You’re a genius!
What is a safe space?
What if someone goes into a ‘safe space’ and reads a the bill of rights aloud?
Do the snowflakes melt?
What if election results are read there?
A display of the electoral college results?
Is Ted Nugent’s “strangle-hold” aloud to be played on earbuds?
So many questions - but what are the rules of conduct in a safe zone that make these snowflakes feel safe? (and what happens when campus conservatives enter?)
They were a ok with the great enslaver before him though.
Freedom is skeeeery and so are those words and ideas different than the ones they’ve been brainwashed with.
The disparity between the little guys of antifa (145 lbs average) and the guys who were supporting Trump was rather amazing. Those little socialist were really weaklings.
“The disparity between the little guys of antifa (145 lbs average) and the guys who were supporting Trump was rather amazing. Those little socialist were really weaklings.”
New Study Finds Wimpy Guys Are More Likely To Be Socialists
MRC TV ^ | May 25, 2017 | Brittany M. Hughes
Posted on 5/26/2017, 11:05:46 AM by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
It’s now been scientifically proven that the wimpier the guy, the more likely he is to be a socialist. No kidding.
According to a new study, physically weaker men are more prone to support socialism, a trend psychologists say may be because they feel they can’t compete against stronger men and are therefore consider inequality more threatening.
According to the Times, U.K., Brunel University ran a study on 171 men, measuring everything from their strength, height, weight and even bicep circumference. What the university found was that the physically inferior men tended to be the ones who said they supported the redistribution of wealth.
The physically stronger men, on the other hand, were a lot more prone to backing capitalism, and said they supported the idea of naturally dominant social groups.
“This is about our Stone Age brains, in a modern society,” explained the university’s own Michael Price. “Our minds evolved in environments where strength was a big determinant of success. If you find yourself in a body not threatened by other males, if you feel you can win competitions for status, then maybe you start thinking inequality is pretty good.”
“Of course this isn’t rational in modern environments, where your ability to win might have more to do with where you went to university,” he added. “Lots of guys who are phenomenally successful in modern societies would probably be nowhere near as successful in hunter gatherer societies.”
Still, Price says, it’s pretty amazing to see how natural dominant instinct plays out in today’s society, where weaker guys appear to find a lot more value in others being forced to share the wealth.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3555559/posts
The little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they leave college and enter the real world.
They’ll be shocked to discover that safe places are not provided by employers. Based on the useless courses they are taking, those employers will include fast food restaurants.
A safe space is a place where “hate speech” is not tolerated or really where free speech is not allowed. It usually consists of a room or a floor of a university building. Sometimes only “oppressed” or “special” groups are allowed in safe spaces so that they are segregated from the rest of the college population.
HMMM A SAFE PLACE: A ROOM WITH SEVERAL GUNS AND AMMO! FOOD AND WATER AND A WAY TO GO TO THE RR.
Safe spaces are censorship and Censorship is a hate crime
Offensive speech is a right, for which past generations of Americans died to protect.
It pains me to see the typical socialist European oppression of free speech taking root in American youth, poisoning their minds :(
Sounds like what they are really seeking is solitary confinement in a prison then.
Sometimes the safe spaces have counselors, stuffed animals, even puppies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.