Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjsheridan5
The simple fact is, the label at the time was "true" as to what was in the product. Regardless of what they called it, the label was factual. Sugar is an accepted generic label for many different things. They were actually being more specific in the label. If they said sucrose, and not sugar, would they have been wrong?

Would the lady still have eaten them?

81 posted on 05/25/2017 12:12:19 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool - you bet that Tommy sees! - Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS

The woman and her attorney are idiots...MEGA-idiots.


82 posted on 05/25/2017 12:13:48 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson