Posted on 05/11/2017 2:24:46 PM PDT by Ennis85
If we stay in the Paris Agreement, energy prices in the US will be higher. If we withdraw and other countries stay in, energy prices in the US will be lower than in the other countries, and we will be more competitive. Companies will locate here instead of the EU. Hmmmm, what should we do?
Oh, my!!! There's $10 or $20 Trillion of extortion money at stake here.
Americas VOTED for Pres. Trump
to Remove ObamaCARE (did not happen)
and the Global Warming Hoax (but his daughter
wants to reset the values as Japan did after Fukushima,
but wants to keep $$$$$$$$$$$$ going to
the DNC by their Global Warming Patent).
Where do Ivanka’s loyalties lie?
For rich and poor countries, she’s seen by many as the best bet for keeping the US in the Paris climate agreement.
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s exactly why she should not be involved.
Things like this are the reason why I'll never fully support Trump. Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner need to be seen and not heard. Bannon is right. They are liberal Democrats with the President's ear. He wasn't elected to be a liberal New York Democrat.
Sadly, the answer may be yes.
My understanding of the Paris deal is that it’s a nondeal. Each country pledged to do what it wants to “combat” global warming. So, Trump does what he wants, which is not much. Am I missing something?
If Trump decides strategically to stay in the agreement, it’s because it’s voluntary and unenforceable. How Trump it would be to get leverage elsewhere by staying in as he furiously works to increase fossil energy production at the expense of clean eagle killing energy, surge US carbon spewing manufacturing and gut stupid environmental regulations. Still, I prefer he pull out, and think he will.
That the treaty will be reinvented and interpreted by US courts so as to be binding on the US. It is why Obama did it. It may be voluntary to make a pledge but once the pledge is made it could be found to be binding. Want to take your chances in a US District Court?
Let’s hope not.
It occurred to me the other day that President Trump may know exactly what he is doing with Ivanka and Jared, and that we may be wasting time worrying about it.
I thought about Trump’s Dad’s advice to him, about “taking the lumps out”.
So, isn’t it possible that he is using young Ivanka and Jared to do just that? Sending her to the Paris talks to see and chat with everyone, charming them with her poise and beauty, all the while saying nothing of significance... a lump taken out when we do nothing of substance on this global warning nonsense.
Same with Jared, he is sent out to give millennials the idea that Trump might listen to his opinion on whatever, and take it into consideration. Of course, Trump just might not, but maybe the next time Jared will be more convincing?
Just the fact that it annoys a lot of us should be a signal that he is moving chess pieces around on the board.
Consider that there is nothing wrong with listening to liberal democrats - after all, once in a blue moon, they might trigger a good idea.
Listening doesn’t imply doing. Watch what Trump does, for that is what matters.
Not in a time when Trump Derangement Disorder is sweeping the judiciary and they just make up ways to rule against him.
In a time of sanity I'd say sure. This thing was never ratified by the Senate and is not law.
Fake news for Fake Science.
If it is based on fake/junk science bs, I sure hope she fails.
No way!!!!!
You are baaaad. : )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.