To: Enchante
After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: gunsequalfreedom
This plant hasn’t produced plutonium since the 1980s. It is all on a kind of maintenance and clean-up basis, I understand, but it is a prolonged, expensive, and difficul process to deal with plutonium.
4 posted on
05/09/2017 10:13:55 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
To: gunsequalfreedom
I don’t agree at all the nuclear power should all be shut down. It makes a lot of sense but new generation reactors should be deployed.
5 posted on
05/09/2017 10:15:01 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
To: gunsequalfreedom
7 posted on
05/09/2017 10:17:06 AM PDT by
Safetgiver
(Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP. This is nuclear weapons industry.
PUREX was last plant built, but is still the legacy of WWII.
11 posted on
05/09/2017 10:20:01 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Liberals think in propaganda)
To: gunsequalfreedom
After Tacoma Narrows you’d think we’d have stopped building bridges and shut them all down.
To: gunsequalfreedom
BS. Nothing is unconditionally safe.Shall we ban cars because of crashes?Aircraft? House because people die in fires? Natural gas use? Windmills chop up birds make noise and spoil the views. EVERY energy source has consequences.
Morenew nuclear plants ,quite possibly thorium fueled is a better stategy.
17 posted on
05/09/2017 10:27:55 AM PDT by
hoosierham
(Freedom isn't free)
To: gunsequalfreedom
After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP. Your position is irrational, and I oppose it strongly. Nuclear power is far safer, per megawatt, fuel to distribution, than any other method of power generation.
18 posted on
05/09/2017 10:28:36 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Trump won; I celebrated; I'm good. Let's get on with the civil war now.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
After the South Fork Dam collapse (killed 2200 people), you’d think we’d have shut down all the dams and stopped building them.
To: gunsequalfreedom
The Hanford reservation is a defense facility and is not related to the commercial nuclear industry,
22 posted on
05/09/2017 10:35:04 AM PDT by
bagman
To: gunsequalfreedom
Get rid of an entire sub-industry and put thousands of people out of work?
23 posted on
05/09/2017 10:36:55 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(Prophecy of sky Gods, the sun and moon)
To: gunsequalfreedom
24 posted on
05/09/2017 10:40:07 AM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP.
I would venture that MANY more lives have been lost, and many, many more shortened (black lung, anyone?) by both oil drilling and coal mining than by nukes, INCLUDING both Chernobyl and Fukishima put together. Men make things, and sometimes you get sick or even die from getting things done. Women also die in childbirth or from things related to childbirth. It is the human condition. We have made mining, drilling and childbirth safer, we can do the same with nuclear energy.
25 posted on
05/09/2017 10:42:29 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
Nuclear power is crazy. But watch me get nuked for saying it. The women on Long Island stopped GE from being completed with the argument that evacuating 15 million in case of an accident couldn’t be done
26 posted on
05/09/2017 10:45:44 AM PDT by
stanne
To: gunsequalfreedom
The nuclear industry would be fine IF people would stop freaking out over the fact that materials naturally break down thru a “bomb suitable” stage - to wit: if you just keep using radioactive materials in a safe & sensible way (modern highly-contained & self-limiting designs), it will degrade into waste at a relatively safe stage. It’s the “OMG bomb-grade!” attitude that leads to fragile designs producing high-intensity waste.
27 posted on
05/09/2017 10:46:09 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
Are you really this stupid? Shut down the entire industry even though its safety record is so much better than other plants?
How much of the base energy generation do you think Nukes take care of in the United States? How about France? UK?
Please leave the ignorance off this forum. Sheesh.
29 posted on
05/09/2017 10:47:57 AM PDT by
Solson
(Trump 2016!)
To: gunsequalfreedom
“After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP.”
If that happens, then you are condemning the world to many more, and more destructive, wars than we currently have. You see, nuclear weapons degrade over time (particularly, and most importantly, the tritium triggers for thermonuclear weapons). Once most of them are gone, our deterrence will be gone with them. Yeah, when push comes to shove we will prevail...but at what cost?
Think, don’t give in to fear-mongering.
30 posted on
05/09/2017 10:50:20 AM PDT by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: gunsequalfreedom; big'ol_freeper; Impy; SevenofNine; Cletus.D.Yokel; Rummyfan; Liberty Valance; ...
Re:
After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP. You'd think anyone using... 'guns equal freedom' as their FR ID--
Wouldn't be so stupid as to think a tidal wave... was caused by the nuclear industry-
33 posted on
05/09/2017 10:52:50 AM PDT by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: gunsequalfreedom
After Fukishima you would think we would be quickly shutting down the nuclear industry. This industry needs to shut down ASAP.
34 posted on
05/09/2017 10:52:54 AM PDT by
DCBryan1
(No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
To: gunsequalfreedom
No, shutting down the nuclear industry would be a panicky childish response to Fukishima. Fukishima ignored American advisors or numerous issues for years.
It is proof of the Japanese mentality, not proof that nuclear power should end.
39 posted on
05/09/2017 11:07:50 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
Yeah right- let’s let a poorly designed Japanese nuclear installation kill off our nuclear industry.
Why not throw in Chernobyl while you’re at it?
45 posted on
05/09/2017 11:26:42 AM PDT by
Pelham
(Liberate California. Deport Mexico Now)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson