She shouldn’t have fired the weapon if he was already running. If, as the story indicated, she had already been told by the police that they couldn’t charge the boy unless they caught in the act, I would have gotten a camera first and taken a picture for the police. I don’t have a problem with her pointing the pistol at the little degenerate, but I think that her real problem is firing it “into the ground”.
Agreed
She should have put two into his head. This yob needs to be put out of his misery
Agreed. Smart phone would have been better than a pistol in this case. Or maybe she did get pictures since they are going ahead with charging the kid with bestiality in the first degree.
Like they told the duck hunter who couldn't bring down a duck: "No harm, no fowl."
” I don’t have a problem with her pointing the pistol at the little degenerate, but I think that her real problem is firing it “into the ground”.”
Perhaps you should read the article.