Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: houeto; P-Marlowe; Jim Robinson

The kicker for me was the dem lawyer admitting that anyone else giving the same order would be fine. The judge indicates it was “the statement” that the dems are building their case on. “The statement” was Trump saying “you know what that means”.

Apparently he said that when issuing either the first or 2nd order. The dems say he meant “we’re gonna get them muslims” and not “we’re concerned with security.”

Evidently this entire case is built on that bit of mind reading.


67 posted on 05/08/2017 3:35:22 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Thank you xzins for that reply. I wasn’t able to see or hear it. I appreciate it FRiend.


73 posted on 05/08/2017 6:40:15 PM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I am watching the replay on C-SPAN1 and I agree with your assessment.

They’re into mind reading. To hell with literal purpose and intent = national security. No, they must get into mind reading.


74 posted on 05/08/2017 7:03:34 PM PDT by onyx (Donate Monthly ~ Join 300 Club!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson