Upholding Trump’s EO should be a slam dunk. It is blatantly, simplisticly OBVIOUS that the language of the 1st and 14th Amendments has nothing to do with foreign refugees outside of the United States. They are not under the “jurisdiction” of any state. Not to mention the clear constitutional authority of the POTUS to make unilateral decisions in this area....
So of course the libtards will find all sorts of convoluted trains of b.s. to try to make up NEW amendments that they wish had existed in place of the ones that actually do exist.
btw, even if it could be accepted that the EO in some ways disadvantaged foreign Muslims (even though it is directed at countries and not religion), that in no way could be a violation of the 1st Amendment which says that CONGRESS (no reference to the President) shall not ESTABLISH a national religion here in the USA. Disfavor abroad toward one of MANY religions in the world in no way establishes one particular religion here in the USA.
The libtards are always just making stuff up, out of whole cloth. Too often the courts let them do it as judges are too often happy to join in the fun.
Listening to Judge Harris’ questioning of The President’s attorney sounded just like a Congressional inquiry from a panel of Democrats. Constant interruption to make liberal talking points. I had to turn it off.
Foreigners here legally are subject to the jurisdiction of the laws. Those whose parents are Illegals are not to be citizens. So, if the parent is here with the express permission of the US a baby could be a citizen since his parents were under the jurisdiction of the law.