Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sasparilla; Diogenesis

>
Republican Rep. Martha McSally of Arizona proposed a stand-alone bill to strike the exemption of Congress from state waiver provisions should the AHCA be enacted into law.
McSally’s bill passed on May 4 by a 429-0 vote
>

It’s no longer the AHCA, is it not?

Why not a simpler bill: Congress shall be bound by any/all laws/rules/regulations as would any other Entity of these United States; no exemptions has hereby apply.


30 posted on 05/06/2017 7:10:41 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

Here’s the actual wording as passed.

If the American Health Care Act is enacted, effective as if included in the enactment of such Act, section 2701(b)(5)(A)(ii) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(5)(A)(ii)), as added by subsection (a) of section 136 of the American Health Care Act (relating to permitting States to waive certain ACA requirements to encourage fair health insurance premiums), is amended by striking “1312(d)(3)(D),”.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2017


34 posted on 05/06/2017 7:19:12 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson