” Either Members vote for what emerges from the House and Senate, or live with the status quo of ObamaCare.”
This is THE problem! And it only take two Rand Pauls to queer the deal in the Senate.
Is this bill being taken up in the Senate under the reconciliation process by which only 51 votes are needed to pass?
If not, I assume the bill can be filibustered in the Senate in which case I believe 60 votes are needed for cloture?
The article says, The bill doesnt repeal all of ObamaCare because it cant without Democratic help under the Senates budget rules, which implies that it is being taken up under reconciliation. Am I to conclude that if the process undertook to repeal Obamacare outright it could not be done under reconciliation and would therefore be subject to filibuster?
Why are we so passively accepting Mitch McConnell's diktat that the filibuster rule will not be eliminated for regular legislation even as it has been done by him to confirm Justice Gorsuch?
I think the answers to these questions tells us whether the italicized statement above is true or not. That is, unless as a practical matter Republican defections would require some Democrat Senators even under reconciliation to bring the vote up to 51.
Perhaps those with full access to the article can explain.
Is this deal anything like the bills they passed under Maobama? I think this deal is only marginally better than Obamacare. So anyone who is demoralized by this puny effort and speaks out, such as Rand Paul (who is a DOCTOR) is a “queer”. Uh huh.
question: How is this plan handling people with pre-existing conditions? I have “progressive” relatives on FaceBook who are going nuts, saying anybody who supports this legislation is just mean.