Skip to comments.
Virginia Governor Vetoes Bill To Protect Police From Violent Protesters
Daily Caller News Foundation ^
| May 1, 2017
| Phillip Stucky
Posted on 05/01/2017 8:45:47 AM PDT by kevcol
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
05/01/2017 8:45:47 AM PDT
by
kevcol
To: kevcol
2
posted on
05/01/2017 8:46:03 AM PDT
by
kevcol
To: kevcol
No good worthless SOB!!!
):^(
3
posted on
05/01/2017 8:48:03 AM PDT
by
elcid1970
("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
To: kevcol
Funny, governor selfie is protected...
4
posted on
05/01/2017 8:48:19 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: kevcol
:: include the same penalty for anyone inciting violence due to someones “race, religious convictions, color, sexual orientation, or national origin” ::
Personally, I’d be able to accept that change since those that oppose the “queer” agenda do so WITHOUT violence. It’s the “queers” who devolve into violent means at these ‘protests’.
5
posted on
05/01/2017 8:49:21 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: kevcol
I don’t like such “some are more equal than others” laws.
6
posted on
05/01/2017 8:49:52 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
To: kevcol
Proof that democRATs hate police.
7
posted on
05/01/2017 8:50:03 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel; ctdonath2; kevcol
This is a simple ploy, nothing else.
Because liberals include anything such as saying “I disagree with homosexuality/affirmative action/name it” as inciting violence, this is a poison pill.
8
posted on
05/01/2017 8:54:15 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(President Donald J. Trump ... Making Liberal Heads Explode, 140 Characters at a Time)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
In many places ANY opposition is labeled violence. To the left the meaning of words is what they want them to mean. Allowing the changes the governor wanted could result in adverse consequences for Conservatives.
To: kevcol
We already have laws for protection of police and firefighter etc. What good are new laws when we don’t enforce existing laws.
10
posted on
05/01/2017 8:59:34 AM PDT
by
IC Ken
To: rlmorel
So, play the Alinsky card!
Agree to the change and let the ‘violent protesters’ convict themselves. Let the local constabulary make arrests [while providing a few hickory-shampoos] and see what happens.
Sort of a “kill them all and let God sort them out” concept.
11
posted on
05/01/2017 9:01:11 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: kevcol
You’ve got to be desperate to take a police position in any city these days. Cops should quit until they are properly protected by policy and law.
12
posted on
05/01/2017 9:04:03 AM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
How about mob violence against opposing political views?
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
I see this stuff, and people like the scumbag McAuliffe using this tactic, and I am more and more in favor or the “Let God sort them out” approach.
I am sick to bloody death of Leftists.
14
posted on
05/01/2017 9:09:36 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(President Donald J. Trump ... Making Liberal Heads Explode, 140 Characters at a Time)
To: kevcol
To: IC Ken
“We already have laws for protection of police and firefighter etc. What good are new laws when we dont enforce existing laws.”
This is virtue signalling to get them re-elected. There are many laws on the books to protect government workers.
16
posted on
05/01/2017 9:10:05 AM PDT
by
dljordan
(WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
To: elcid1970
how did we get a clinton carpet bagger from Syracuse to be our gov.
17
posted on
05/01/2017 9:11:03 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
(just a conspiracy theory, no facts behind the above post.)
To: kevcol
Terry McAuliffe Clinton, what piece of criminal excrement
To: kevcol
Terry McAuliffe Clinton, what piece of criminal excrement
To: ctdonath2
20
posted on
05/01/2017 9:21:10 AM PDT
by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson