“The problem is not one “caucus.” It is the whole Party. How many dissenters were there in the election of Paul Ryan as Speaker? One, I think.”
I think your over simplifying one particular vote for one particular man. Do you support everything the man you elected does? No or you wouldn’t be here complaining about them.
In the same respect Paul Ryan almost certainly represents the compromise canadit among the republicans in the house.
If he fails to expose the Tuesday Group’s RINO traitors and instead allows them to take down the party with their own backstabbing tretury then i suspect a great many of his supporters will drop out. Indeed i suspect he has already lost a great many supporters for allowing it to go this far.
I am saying there was no dissent. They all knew what he is. They all approved enough to make him their honcho. It is not just one aberration in a long list of deeds. It is the basis for all those deeds and they are almost all oriented to not offending the Democrats whom Republicans consider to be the natural Rulers of the nation and to not jeopardizing their outside income and future employment.
Paul Ryan is NOT a compromise. He is purely the globalist Democrat and Chamber o Commerce candidate. There is no compromise in him. What compromise there is is of the same character as the compromises Trump can get working with other Democrats.