Chomsky has done lots damage to linguistics. The basic problem is that his generative grammar throws away meaning. Like any other word or sentence structure, grammar has a range of categories that impart meaning. Grammar is not a meaningless transformation like Chomsky alleges.
Very nice shredding of this original tissue of BS that made Chomsky famous.
I would add my critique in a little different light: He is another desperate atheist trying to find meaning in a world where he is willfully blind to true meaning.
Ironically, he admires Bertrand Russell (another atheist/leftist) who FAILED so dramatically to even be able to reduce mathematics to a set of first principles, as demonstrated in Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem.
But these educated idiots stick with their materialistic ignorance at all costs.