Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

So we built a nuke waste facility that last I heard was in the $240 billion range, that needs an additional $29 billion to possibly become operational. But we still aren’t sure we can ever use it, and yet there is no money for a wall. Is that about right?


4 posted on 04/27/2017 4:33:11 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VTenigma

Anyone that received power from a utility with a nuclear power plant paid money that went to the DOE to construct that site. The federal government collected the money but never took the spent fuel rods resulting in them be stored on site all over the country. That needs to be rectified.


5 posted on 04/27/2017 6:05:22 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: VTenigma

“But we still aren’t sure we can ever use it, and yet there is no money for a wall. Is that about right?”

No, that is not about right. As far as safety and feasibility we KNOW we can use it and the material stored there will be many times more secure and safe there than all the places it is temporarily stored now. What is the expected “shelf life” of the Yucca facility? At minimum 1,000 years. The arguments against it are not science based, they are irrational.


11 posted on 04/27/2017 7:05:46 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson