Arthur McGowan wrote: “You seem to believe that “cognitive dissonance” is some kind of all-purpose incantation that banishes pesky facts. WTC #7 collapsed in a perfectly symmetrical controlled demolition. What is your explanation for this fact?”
Um..., my explanation..., you have such an advanced case of cognitive dissonance that you don’t comprehend those “pesky” argumentative fallacies? For example; “Begging the Question?” Can you see that your premises contain your conclusion?
By the way, thank you for these stunning examples of “begging the question” and “cognitive dissonance”, I’ll use them!
One of the amazing things about people with cognitive dissonance is that they believe in not just one or two “conspiracy theories”, but in many conspiracy theories. Do you believe in any others? Or do you just believe in the classic WTC Demolition Conspiracy?
Thank you for being so open with your malady.
You brought up “conspiracy.” I haven’t mentioned it.
I have seen video of the collapse of WTC #7. It is a perfect controlled demolition.
Please note: I haven’t engaged in any speculation.
What is YOUR explanation for the fact that the collapse is perfectly symmetrical?
I have two degrees in philosophy. You do not know the meaning of “begging the question.”
I did not put out premises—and I did not reach a conclusion.
I told you what the video SHOWS.
The video SHOWS a perfect controlled demolition.
Since the video SHOWS a controlled demolition, the burden of proof is on anyone who claims there was no controlled demolition.
Start at 10::00
Explain how the controlled demolition shown in the video is not a controlled demolition.
Please note that I have not mentioned any theories.
Let’s see if you are capable of responding without irrelevancies or personal abuse.
Start at 10::00
Explain how the controlled demolition shown in the video is not a controlled demolition.
Please note that I have not mentioned any theories.
Let’s see if you are capable of responding without irrelevancies or personal abuse.