Posted on 04/23/2017 10:27:38 PM PDT by Michael van der Galien
Le Pen is a long shot, but Trump was also a long shot.
Even Fillon (Republican Party) has advocated for Macron. You might see a third of his voters go toward Le Pen, but it doubtful that she will get past the 35-percent point.
The ‘empty-suit’ Macron will easily win this, and in a year....the public will ask who is this guy? The Rothschild bank folks pull the strings on this future of France.
Can foreigners donate to a French politician?
35% would be a victory for the Front National.
Perhaps we can hire the Russians to hack the election.
>Le Pen is a long shot, but Trump was also a long shot.
Trump was much closer in the polls. Le Pen big problem is the media. They’re 100% against against her 100% of the time and she doesn’t have Trump skills to go around them.
The commies are out.
Two things: anybody else weirded out by Macron marrying his former teacher? She’s only 25 years older.
Will there be a debate between LePen and Macron? If so, this gives LePen the best chance to expose her opponents inexperience while showing that she’s fairly moderate...and not some far right lunatic.
Yep, looks like France opted for a clone of Turdeau Jr.
I think it was a Frenchman who rightly said “People get the government they deserve.”
I can’t wait for the 20% that didn’t vote to vote for LePenn.
But Macron does look good in a 3,000-Euro suit....you have to admit that. Amazing how a guy graduates from college 17 years ago with a degree in philosophy, and ends up as French president in 2017.
I’ve noticed that many reporters always pronounce Macrons name as the French say it (Mah cruhn) but then pronounce Marine Le Pen just as you’d expect an average person in the US would (MA reene rather than ... mah REENE).
Personally I think we should say then all the USA way .... after all we say they speak French, not Frances, and we say. Paris not PahREE. So as far as I’m concerned, Macron rhymes with Akron.
AP is characterizing this election as “extreme right” Le Pen vs “centrist” Macron. But until a few years ago Macron was a Socialist which, I suppose, is not that bad in France but anyone who is a nationalist is “extreme right” according to AP and their ilk.
Press is calling Le Pen far right only because of her immigration stance. In economic matters she is far-left. Much farther left than Macron.
As always, the MSM labelling of Marine Lepen as “extreme right” is dead wrong. She is environmentalist, economically collectivist and interventionnist and socially leftist (she lives with a “companion” without marrying him, she is pro-abortion and pro gay marriage).
Like many French, I’ll vote for her at the run-off even knowing that she has no chance against Macron just to show the middle finger to the establishment.
But Macron winning the presidency is only part of the story, there are the legislative elections one month later which will decide the prime minister who holds a lot of executive power. It’s not at all sure Macron’s out-of-the-blue party will have a majority of seats, so the prime minister may well be someone from the Right which will lead to a “cohabitation” government, a status quo which will worsen even more the economic and social situation of France. Indeed, we have the government we deserve.
If you want to stick it to your favorite Feminazi relative just remind them that LePen is trying to break through the all-male glass ceiling as men have ruled France since the Middle Ages!
You can have one or the other.
But not both.
Enclaves of Sharia is occupation.
TIME is running out. And going backwards.
Dewey Defeats Truman!
Marine Le Penn can’t destroy France. That has already happened.
Her task would be to rebuild France from the ashes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.