You think like a ChiCom.
Twisted backward logic, non-understanding of modern nation states vs former dynastic rule.
And double standard inconsistencies where you would argue Korea was part of China but would never admit China was, by the same logic, part of Japan.
Korea was never part of China and your own posts prove it.
“non-understanding of modern nation states vs former dynastic rule.”
You have nation-states under dynastic rule - England under the Tudors, Stuarts, Hanover. Bourbon France. And non-dynastic rule in old feudal states like Poland. And in the three cases above, all had aspects of one and aspects of the other. Highly recommended for a truly deep dive into the nature of a European traditional state, Hippolyte Taine, “France under the Old Regime”.
There is no such thing as this, precisely, vs that, clearly different. No clear lines or uncomplicated categories. We are discussing human societies, that most messy of things.