Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adorno
Nobody nominated Assange and/or Wikileaks to be judge and juror when it comes to trying to "fix" the "illegal activities" in the intel community.

Your "judge and juror" straw man fallacy aside, legitimate whistleblowers aren't nominated.

71 posted on 04/20/2017 5:16:31 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
...legitimate whistleblowers aren't nominated

Legitimate whistleblowers? Now there's a real strawman for you!

So, what gave Assange the authority to become a whistleblower, or the right to distribute information gathered illegally from data banks that contain secrets which contain information that could damage the country and/or people that the information pertains to?
98 posted on 04/21/2017 10:48:36 AM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson