Skip to comments.
Sources: US prepares charges to seek arrest of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange
cnn.com ^
| 4/20/17
| Evan Perez, Pamela Brown, Shimon Prokupecz and Eric Bradner,
Posted on 04/20/2017 3:38:16 PM PDT by ColdOne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Yet hillary still walks around not in prison orange.
1
posted on
04/20/2017 3:38:16 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: ColdOne
Trump is going to lose a big chunk of his base over this.
Instead of worrying about Assaage leaking CIA’s methods of snooping on Americans, Trump should be slamming the door on this illegal CIA malfeasance.
Big effin mistake.
2
posted on
04/20/2017 3:41:15 PM PDT
by
pissant
((Deport 'em all))
To: pissant
3
posted on
04/20/2017 3:42:11 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
To: ColdOne
US prepares charges to seek arrest of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange
Shouldn't this be really, really, really old news?
To: ColdOne
The Justice Department investigation of Assange and WikiLeaks dates to at least 2010...Assange gets the book thrown at him while Hillary skates.
It's as if Obama still controls the DOJ.
5
posted on
04/20/2017 3:43:23 PM PDT
by
FreeReign
To: ColdOne
6
posted on
04/20/2017 3:43:56 PM PDT
by
Zathras
To: pissant
It is in a word stupid. You sure this is a Trump decision? Or perhaps intel community speaking out of turn?
What are the charges? Unlawful journalism?
Everything and anything Wikileaks produces is already compromised information.
7
posted on
04/20/2017 3:44:36 PM PDT
by
Fhios
To: ColdOne
To: ColdOne
9
posted on
04/20/2017 3:45:53 PM PDT
by
4Godsoloved..Hegave
(Trusting God is a full time job, He is on duty 24/7)
To: Fhios
And how many times has the NY Times, CNN and Washington Post obtained and leaked highly classified information in the couple of years?
Arrest those bastards.
10
posted on
04/20/2017 3:46:34 PM PDT
by
pissant
((Deport 'em all))
To: ColdOne
Prosecutors have struggled with whether the First Amendment precluded the prosecution of Assange, but now believe they have found a way to move forward.
Prosecutors were looking for a way to allow a criminal to get away with a crime. A crime is a crime is a crime...
The first amendment was not intended to protect someone from prosecution if the crime committed was the cause of harm to others, including people and business entities and government entities.
A person does not have the right to yell fire in a crowded theater, and neither does he/she have the right to protection under the constitution, if that person had committed crimes detrimental to one's life, and in the case of Assange, hundreds and perhaps as many as millions of lives were put in danger via his "spying" operation. No one can hold up the first amendment in one hand, while pulling the "trigger" with the other hand.
11
posted on
04/20/2017 3:47:07 PM PDT
by
adorno
(w)
To: 4Godsoloved..Hegave
I don’t care about his motives; I care that he revealed the shocking extent to which the information we receive is controlled, censored, and manipulated.
After they finish putting in jail all those whose crimes were revealed by wikileaks, THEN they can worry about prosecuting Assange.
Otherwise, the motives of those seeking to prosecute him (and who are not outraged about the rest) must be suspect.
To: pissant
Big effin mistake.Maybe. Who knows what could come out at trial?
13
posted on
04/20/2017 3:53:14 PM PDT
by
AmusedBystander
(The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
To: adorno
Nonsense. Prosecute the effin leakers withing CIA, not the publisher of the leaks. And while were at it, shut down all the UNCONSTITUTIONAL DOMESTIC SPYING committed by the CIA and NSA and FBI
14
posted on
04/20/2017 3:54:37 PM PDT
by
pissant
((Deport 'em all))
To: ColdOne
.
The world owes Julian Assange!
.
15
posted on
04/20/2017 3:54:58 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: ColdOne
But for God using Assange to expose Hillary, her campaign, and the DNC, we may very well have been under a Clinton presidency. He deserves a medal and a pardon, not an indictment!
To: Fhios
“It is in a word stupid. You sure this is a Trump decision? Or perhaps intel community speaking out of turn?”
Seems like it’s coming from Jeff Sessions, who said at a press conference today Assange’s arrest was ‘a priority’.
17
posted on
04/20/2017 3:57:09 PM PDT
by
The Numbers
(God, Family and Country is Right.)
To: ColdOne
big error - if they don’t reading leaked info on wikileaks then plug the dam leaks
To: ColdOne
Pompeo laid the groundwork for this last week with his anti Assange diatribe. Looks like Trump is getting with the program...
To: ColdOne
CNN??? Really....
They can’t stand Julian and remember they told us that we were not to believe what Wiki Leaks said until it went through them first...
President Trump isn’t going to do anything to Julian...this is all
‘bird crap on a newspaper by New York Times fish wrap’!!!
20
posted on
04/20/2017 3:59:36 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson