Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: "Bill O'Reilly doesn't know what the hell he's talking about"
Youtube ^ | Aug 21, 2015 | Mark Levin

Posted on 04/20/2017 12:16:34 AM PDT by conservative98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: conservative98

Could you imagine sharing a dinner with a raving lunatic? “Which one?” you might ask.


21 posted on 04/20/2017 5:04:48 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry

O’Reilly’s ratings were high because he held the moderate viewers both Democrat and Republican. He always had good guests on and his segments were entertaining.

But in saying that, he was still a coward, afraid to face off against the people he attacked.


22 posted on 04/20/2017 5:06:33 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Nuke Bilderberg from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Can’t disagree with that statement.


23 posted on 04/20/2017 5:11:32 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

O’Reilly was “fair”with everyone, meaning that he didn’t listen and inserted his own bizarre “common sense” to argue with every decent point of view. He was ok to Trump but I still hated to hear O’Reilly interview anyone.


24 posted on 04/20/2017 5:15:03 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I think O’Reilly was generally fair. To be honest with you, he was much harder on crazy liberals like Barney Frank.


25 posted on 04/20/2017 5:23:38 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

For me a war between Markie and BORe is like the Iran - Iraq war. I didn’t know whom to root for and whom the want to see lose or win. I wanted them both to loose.
BORe was/is/always will be a phony and Markie just wants to be part of the winning team.


26 posted on 04/20/2017 5:28:00 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’d agree BOR was ok half the time. He was obnoxious and ill informed the other half of the time. Interesting to me one of his last guests was Lou Dobbs who told BOR off and had no tolerance for all of Bill’s strange obstructions.


27 posted on 04/20/2017 5:45:14 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Despite his vaunted aggressiveness, O’Reilly was really a finger-to-the-wind kind of guy on almost every political subject. He just about ALWAYS waited to see the direction things were going before staking out his own position. Some would call that wise. Someone like Dobbs would call it weak.

Oddly, O’Reilly did not do that with Trump who was a personal friend of his. He invariably tried to present Trump’s side of every argument or misunderstanding.


28 posted on 04/20/2017 5:49:47 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I agree he was good to Trump. But he insisted on weird opinions. He kept telling Dobbs that we can buy off Putin over Iran but that we can’t bribe China and therefore can’t stop NK. Where does he even get this stuff? He’s like a guy who has to argue with everyone in the tavern.


29 posted on 04/20/2017 5:54:04 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Back in the Clintoon administration we got DTV only because of Bill O’Reilly...guess we’ll miss him.


30 posted on 04/20/2017 5:55:57 AM PDT by exPBRrat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98; Az Joe; Nifster

That’s not the point

We don’t defend only who we like

O Reilly and Limbaugh detested one another yet Rush just opened saying just what I’ve been saying

The liberal Murdoch youngers

Issues from nearly 15 years ago some of which are just silly crap like the at first welcomed by the women dildo orgasm till she later figured there was an easy payday in it over 10 years ago

Lisa Bloom a major orchestrator in all this and a major rapist in chief donator organizer with her mom Gloria Allred

It goes on and on

It was an orchestrated take down by leftist hypocrites

The Left can’t win via ratings so they choose to destroy you

That’s exactly what happened here and nobody here lived Obutthead whom we knew not to be super conservative but that’s not how the rest of the media thought of him

Now they will continue to head hunt while they never suffer consequence for anything

That’s no victory

You guys have let your personal animus against OButthead which is shared by nearly all of us here cloud the real issue

Which is the Left will try to take down anyone in public life they disagree with regardless of the merit or how much of a egotistical blowhard take one is

The younger Murdoch have ignored their fathers wisdom to push their 1.5 billion dollar cash flow annually FNC further Left I guess just to get invited to more cocktail parties

Again nothing to celebrate except Tucker and Bolling

If we lose Fox completely we’ll I’m sure some of y’all remember how that used to be

And yes the internet helps but it won’t offset it

Good day to each of you

PS the real victor here is who started the takedown

Emily Steel a millennial at the New York Times

A crusade for her


31 posted on 04/20/2017 9:53:27 AM PDT by wardaddy (Multiculturalism: Everyone wants to inhabit the world of white men with no white men in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

I Don’t believe in kicking someone when they are down.


32 posted on 04/20/2017 9:59:02 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I will not defend the Luffa Boy. His history is long and repugnant. He brought this on himself


33 posted on 04/20/2017 10:07:22 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nifster; Pelham; nopardons

You’re going to remember how this all started if one day Fox is barely distinguishable from the other Alphabets

Just to educate me

You seem to know

What did he do precisely

I’ve read the concensual phone sex story

Some overt flattery talk

Hot chocolate comment

The only one I think is egregious is the phone sex with another woman while married

I assume he cheated on his wife

Are we to discard every man or woman who does that ?

I doubt you think that

I’m unaware he forced anything or quid pro quo on anyone

The roar did him in

And yes I don’t like him either

You don’t to respond but remember our discussion

It won’t end her

Geraldo is lucky he’s fairly lib or they’d be on his formerly quaalude addled butt

Why not go after the lovely Baritoromo or Guilfoyle or for God sake Jeanine Pierro

I love all those gals but their closets are full too of not so great romantic behavior

Anyhow

Have you really dug into this I’d like to see links you might could change my mind if you have something bad

Wendy Walsh ultra lib

NOW

Lisa Bloom the architect

I dig into all I see is boorish behavior and easy payoffs for women most of whom weren’t forced into being with him

Juliet Huddy filed after the fact she was with him?

I mean really

He’s an arrogant idiot I’ll give you that but these women are motivated mostly by money or politics

Rupert and Roger just paid them off...

The media acts like only Fox has sexual friction

Imagine the gay intrigue at MSNBC lol

The only victims are see are his wife(s) and kids


34 posted on 04/20/2017 10:28:34 AM PDT by wardaddy (Multiculturalism: Everyone wants to inhabit the world of white men with no white men in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Like I said

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3545712/posts


35 posted on 04/20/2017 10:30:11 AM PDT by wardaddy (Multiculturalism: Everyone wants to inhabit the world of white men with no white men in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Fox is already indistinguishable from the alphabets


36 posted on 04/20/2017 11:16:38 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Hardly


37 posted on 04/20/2017 11:38:42 AM PDT by wardaddy (Multiculturalism: Everyone wants to inhabit the world of white men with no white men in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Never a shortage of conservatives who revel in eating their own allies.

Republicans eating their own

38 posted on 04/20/2017 12:10:13 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I understand. He is hard to defend but the Leftists are worse.


39 posted on 04/20/2017 12:44:38 PM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JediJones; Hot Tabasco

Not surprised to see you two on the sensible side

Salute


40 posted on 04/20/2017 1:14:12 PM PDT by wardaddy (Multiculturalism: Everyone wants to inhabit the world of white men with no white men in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson