As I said, I don’t know whether he’s guilty or not.
Neither do you.
We know (well, at least we’re TOLD) that he paid off women so that they wouldn’t come out with a bunch of garbage and ruin his career. He’s rich. I can well imagine that, innocent or not, he felt it was easier to pay them off and get them to go away rather than risk his career. If so, it was probably a really bad choice. But it is NOT proof of guilt.
Well it didnt work forever, maybe in his next venture the women will be ugly and he won't be so tempted.
He should try MSNBC.
I guess Bill Clinton can use your argument too. Or is only bad when he does it?