It was a super saver seat and not guaranteed. For members of the commentariat to defend Dao’s right to a seat is for those same members to reject the property rights of businesses. Federal regulations imposed on businesses regularly ignore property rights, and because they do costs for their customers rise to reflect government disdain for property.
Have you forgotten my request for links? You were going to backup your statement—unless it was a smear—that Dao had a history of out of control anger. Why would you post something like that with zero evidence? Please link to your source; thank you.
Also, since you mentioned hucksterism separately from the pain pilks, you obviously know of additional shady activities in Dao’s past. Please link to those too.