Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boundary line drawn over N Korea nuke issue (China will not allow US to attack N Korea)
Global Times ^ | 4/18/17 | Unnamed Chinese Communist

Posted on 04/17/2017 5:39:24 PM PDT by ifinnegan

Military action against North Korea is not an easy question to answer. If the blow is light, Pyongyang's military power would remain intact, and South Koreans could potentially face a revenge attack of some kind. One can only hope that Washington reaches out to Seoul for a second opinion. If the blow is heavy, the Chinese people will not allow their government to remain passive when the armies of the US and South Korea start a war and try to take down the Pyongyang regime. The Chinese will not let something like that happen, especially on the same land where the Chinese Volunteer Army once fought in the early 1950s. It is a land covered with the blood of Chinese soldiers who bravely fought in the early 1950s. Furthermore, if Pyongyang were to be taken by the allied armies of the US and South Korea, it would dramatically change the geopolitical situation in the Korean Peninsula.

(Excerpt) Read more at globaltimes.cn ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braking; china; chinank; editorial; korea; nkthreat; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: piytar

It’ just not time yet.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well it better be time soon because it looks like President Trump is ready, willing, and able to crush the NORKS.


81 posted on 04/17/2017 7:28:31 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Can’t a deal just be cut with China if after Kim’s regime Falls and the koreas are eventually United that there will be no American or South Korean military installations in what was North Korea.


82 posted on 04/17/2017 7:57:53 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Key word: start

That’s a wide open door. But considering how China’s labor camps rival those of NPK, I can see how they wouldn’t want to sign onto pre-emptive military intervention, because that would put their own practices under the footlights.


83 posted on 04/17/2017 7:58:38 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

Arrived early November,1952. I had points to come home in October. But when the war ended in August, 1953, some officers were asked to stay on for 60 days more to train replacements. There was the promise of changing from reserve (OCS) to regular which interested me at the time, but changed my mind later.


84 posted on 04/17/2017 8:13:43 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

“Can’t be more clear. “

It’s very vague actually.

If they wanted to make things crystal clear they would say that an attack on NK is an attack on China.

But this “we won’t remain passive” BS could mean anything. It shows that they are not fully committed to NK. If you ask me I think they just blinked. Airstrikes against NK should start immediately.


85 posted on 04/17/2017 8:18:17 PM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Quick decapitation is the only remaining unilateral action.

China is saying they will not allow the US Army (and by extension the ROK Army) to invade North Korea. And I’m pretty sure that was never in the US playbook to begin with.

But that does not mean that China will attack the US if we decide to bomb North Korea into a past century. They would be fools to even have such thoughts.

China has about 300 nuclear warheads. We have about 6000, with 1550 ready for immediate, and I mean immediate, employment.

This article is the refined version of NORK bluster and should be ignored.

Completely ignored.


86 posted on 04/17/2017 8:18:35 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

“Technically, a state of war still exists between the UN and North Korea”

Technically, not since 1951.


87 posted on 04/17/2017 8:30:28 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

“Technically, a state of war still exists between the UN and North Korea”

Technically, not since 1951.


88 posted on 04/17/2017 8:30:37 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

“One can only hope that Washington reaches out to Seoul for a second opinion.”

The dimwit Chinese don’t seem to realize the issue is not the safety of South Korea.

The issue is the safety of the US and Japan.

And, yes, we will start a nuclear war over our own safety. After all, we’ve done it before.


89 posted on 04/17/2017 8:33:56 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

If there was a nuclear armed dictatorship openly threatening to annihilate China how would China respond?


90 posted on 04/17/2017 8:37:45 PM PDT by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I have a friend who was a Marine clerk typist in Nam. He said there are plans and logistics to invade every country.
When Albright gave the Norks nuclear tech in the mid nineties, I figured it had to be part of an evil plan, which seems to be blossoming now.

I have the opinion that every war since the sinking of the Maine has been stratigiezed. Rothschild’s and all that.


91 posted on 04/17/2017 8:39:12 PM PDT by bigmak007 (They who can't control their own passions, want to passionately control others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“Quick decapitation is the only remaining unilateral action.”

Quick decapitation might lead to kamikaze nuclear attacks on everybody they can hit.

It’s very common in Asian cultures to commit suicide when the master is killed.


92 posted on 04/17/2017 8:42:19 PM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The Chinese government needs to... come to grips with the reality the United States will not sit idly by and watch North Korea reach the level it can blackmail the U.S., Japan, and other U.S. interests with nuclear weapons.

Aren't things already at that level?

93 posted on 04/17/2017 8:48:01 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Better now than when they have 100 nukes they can deliver on US soil.

In fact there is no better time than now. Each and every day that goes by increases the risk and the destruction that will ensue.

Now. Not tomorrow.


94 posted on 04/17/2017 8:49:52 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“The issue is the safety of the US and Japan.”

Have to wonder about China wanting to protect Japan, as it’s not been that many years since Japan committed atrocities in that country. The US may forgive and forget, but China?


95 posted on 04/17/2017 8:52:42 PM PDT by DandG13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: R_Kangel
This is an issue about the possibility of expensive refugees streaming across the border from DPRK into China if the DPRK was attacked. China knows this and it is my guess that that is more than likely one of the main leverage points used by Trump to get China to pull in the reins on the DPRK.

Agreed. That is at least one shared consensus between the people of China and the regime. No refugees.
96 posted on 04/17/2017 9:05:41 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I don’t really care what the Chicomms think. We have to do what is in our interest, not theirs.


97 posted on 04/17/2017 9:46:11 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Just bomb the **** out of them.

Trump won’t pull the rug out from under his generals like Truman.
Tell the Chinese they can have everything above the 38th parallel after we turn it into a parking lot if they turn it into a giant Harbor Freight and sell us hammers, Migs and air compressors for cost-plus.
The Chinese aren’t stupid enough to threaten global thermonuclear war every Friday like fat boy.
Series. Put the blocks to that little ****.


98 posted on 04/17/2017 9:48:37 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

It does make a person wonder if China allowed the N. Korea thing to fester on purpose. But regardless how it happened the world has to deal with it. So far China is not willing to do anything to their communist comrades. Which means Trump will have to make the hard decision and do a preemptive strike to destroy their offensive capabilities. The clock is ticking.


99 posted on 04/18/2017 2:33:14 AM PDT by gold submarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I agree. It appears to me that the global leaders have already decided that north Korea’s time has come to an end and they must be taken out before it is too late. The US has kicked the can down the road for too many decades and allowed this to fester and get worse. It must be dealt with now, in the next few weeks or many cities could eventually get nuked around the world by an insane dictator.


100 posted on 04/18/2017 2:33:14 AM PDT by gold submarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson