Posted on 04/17/2017 4:24:02 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
All at once, Bill O’Reilly is fighting for his TV life. The future of O’Reilly’s long career at Fox News may hinge on a sexual-harassment accusation raised by a woman named Wendy Walsh, who has alleged that O’Reilly propositioned her in a Los Angeles hotel in 2013, then retaliated against her when she rebuffed him........
......In view of the stakes involved, O’Reilly’s camp is vigorously contesting Walsh’s allegation, in an unusually public way. His advocates have challenged details of her story, as well as some of the media reporting about it........
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
O’Reilly is being targeted because he has made tough, frank comments about the real problems affecting Black Americans.
13 million worth of checks between Fox and BOR.
You can stick a fork in the blowhard. He is done.
O’Reilly needs a big loofa to scrub this away.
Is the spinning pinhead the loofah or the falafel?
I noticed all these allegiations against O'Reilly came at a time that FoxNews was the only network defending Trump.
It is my personal opinion that powerful liberals (the Clintons, Obama, etc) offered sweet deals to women to attack O'Reilly. That way they could not defend Trump.
It has been revealed that the DINGBAT DNC chairman had a propaganda campaign setup to accuse Trump colluding with Russians.
The way Russia is treating Trump (and getting burned badly by Trump), it appears this to be a lie.
If the Russians colluded with Trump, they would be crying foul over Syria as well as other things right now.
Is there proof? Does she have audio or video? I am not on BOR’s side, per se, but ANYONE can accuse a public figure of ANYTHING. If she has proof, fair enough. But I am fed up with accusers being believed, simply because they say something happened. The ACCUSERS of Clinton, and all other Democrats, were pretty fearlessly persecuted, but when it is a supposed Conservative, the accuser isn’t usually required to prove their allegations. Period. Wiener was only caught and punished because there was PROOF. Let the truth come out.
Does this mean that 0’Reilly’s world is about to become Watter’s larger world?
The left will do anything to criminalize dissent.
If O’reilly does have to go
Replace him with someone more conservative. That’ll show the lib a-holes
This isn't about BOR.. This is about the leftist wet dream of beheading Fox.
Don’t mix your posse with your paycheck.
Or she could be a money blackmailing hussie.
Non disclosure agreements are worthless when your opponents can replace the payments.
So it’s back to he said, she said; without evidence.
No one claimed BOR offensive behavior while they were working at Fox, even anonymously since the 2004 case.
So he has to put up with the claims, like any famous person has to from time to time. Only difference is the deep pockets of his political enemies.
Just like in election politics, there’s no concept of fairness and BOR is an election entity.
Falafel-Loofah Boy is finished. Andrea Mackris, his ex-wife, and now all these other bimbos are gonna take down “Anchorman.” For me, he’s always been an insufferable bore and an unwatchable horse’s @$$.
Well, she seems to have some big cans, but I wouldn’t trade my van for a shot at her.
There’s blood in the water and the piranhas are circling.
We’ve Gold Diggers jumping on the O’Reilly Train faster than Michael Moore can jump on a free buffet.
Anyone who likes Trump is a target.
Amen. “Don’t dip your pen in the company inkwell.”
And these days, don’t even look crosseyed at a female employee, or you run the risk of a harassment claim. Don’t ask about personal life, spouse, children...don’t comment on dress or appearance...don’t attend company social activities without your spouse, or if single/unmarried, not at all...don’t laugh, tell self-deprecating stories, or speak of anything except the task at hand.
She's hired a lawyer and is making this allegation months after the incident with no proof?
In the last paragraph of the article, the attorney says she wanted to spare her children the bad publicity. This is splashed all over the press now. Avoid publicity? Yeah, riiiight.
O'Reilly's gone on offense here. He needs to. Winning in court is not about who's telling the "truth" or not but who sounds like they are.
This all smells funny to me. I don't care if O'Reilly made a pass at this gal. Happens in the world all the time. He wasn't her boss. He was doing her favors. Maybe he asked for a favor in return. Who cares? That's his business.
But this gal wants money. She denies that now but wait, she wants her pot of gold. She sees a big payoff here. Is she a gold-digger?
I don't watch O'Reilly so I don't have a dog in this fight. But it appears that Walsh is trying to screw the pooch on this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.