Supreme Court won't hear case challenging government's expedited removal of undocumented immigrants

CNN ^ | 4/17/2017 | Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter

[mdittmar]

(CNN)The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion rejecting claims by undocumented Central American women and children -- who were apprehended immediately after arriving in the country without authorization -- seeking asylum.

Lawyers for the families sought to challenge their expedited removal proceedings in federal court arguing they face gender-based violence at home, but a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims.

The court's action means the government can continue to deny asylum seekers placed in expedited removal a chance to have their cases heard by federal court.

[Tucker39]

I always liked Webb Pierce’s recording of that.....and several other numbers.

[soycd]

>arguing they face gender-based violence at home

Being too lazy or cowardly to deal with the filth making your home dirty is no excuse to bring your problems here.
Grow a pair or marry one, but do not let bad people take root or run you out of your home.

Way too many people in this world EXPECT those of us that worked to make our homes comfortable to do it for them. No.

[backwoods-engineer]

Yes! Kick them out! We have our own problems!

[Gahanna Bob]

Good omen for Trump’s travel pause.

[Reno89519]

Hopefully a turning point decision.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Be very careful how you gloat, however, as Trump personally has a humanitarian streak. He’d back reforms.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Well, the leftist (which isn’t always the same as liberal, sometimes they are illiberal) lobby has a disquieting ally in the majority of Jews in America, and these Jews have disquieting stories to tell of how WWII wartime America refused them asylum, with some later going to the Holocaust.

History can prove a ball and chain.

Trump will compromise sooner or later. The only question is, how.

[TADSLOS]

The Party’s Over. Get on the Deportation Train.

[teacherwoes]

"The court simply held that such aliens may not invoke the Constitution to demand procedural steps or measures regarding their applications for admission beyond those provided by existing statutes and regulations"

But didn't the judge in Seattle (talking about Trump's executive order) say that every person in the world is protected by the Constitution?

[AAABEST]

I normally hate spelling/grammar nazis, but I agree, that one really needed to be addressed.

[hal ogen]

Deport ALL illegal aliens. Seize their assets. If they return, shoot them. Have a great day.

[CivilWarBrewing]

"..federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims."

Amen! Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! Common sense is WINNING.

[central_va]

asylum seekers

will go home and tell all the other wise Latina interlopers that the gringo is starting to wisen up. So don't try is sister.

[lulu16]

Then they should be raiding Tucson AZ, it is around 60 miles away.

[Liz]

.............and take all your relatives w/ you...........

[Nifster]

Bwahahaha

Means they couldn’t get four votes to review it

[SharpRightTurn]

Woo hoo!

Expedite them straight to the border and push them over to the other side.

[SharpRightTurn]

“at least as to aliens who have been denied initial entry”

Catch them close to the border and boot them back over before they try to sink roots and forum-shop some leftist judge.

[SharpRightTurn]

“Trump will compromise sooner or later. The only question is, how.”

We’ll be well served if Trump delegates the enforcement entirely to Sessions and Trump focuses on getting the wall funded and built.

[HiTech RedNeck]

If he negotiates a modification in the law, the hard liners will not be pleased.