Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

Your argument seems to be that Descartes was persecuted by the Church, therefore he was not a product of Christian culture and cannot be said to have been produced by Christian culture.


So, where are the Muslim, Hindu, or Chinese Descartes?

That is the counter argument. Science sprang from Christianity, and not from other religions. The persecutions of the Church were relatively feeble attempts that did not stop the development of science. In fact, the Church did numerous things to promote science. The pope funded Galileo, as noted above, as it did many early scientists.

From TexasGator:
“Fortunately he did not adhere to the ‘Christian’ science teachings of that day ...”

Exactly the point, isn’t it?

Islam, China, India, all had several times the population of Christendom. None of them produced science. They could easily have copied early Christian scientists, and made discoveries of their own. They had the resources. They had the contacts with Europe. They did not do it. Why?

Because their basic philosophies were not compatible with scientific inquiry and the search for truth.


57 posted on 04/15/2017 11:30:50 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

“Your argument seems to be that Descartes was persecuted by the Church, therefore he was not a product of Christian culture and cannot be said to have been produced by Christian culture.”

The author premises that the Christian Doctrine is what promoted our science. He then lists first Descartes as an example.

WTH! Descartes was the antithesis of the Christian Doctrine that banned his works!


61 posted on 04/15/2017 11:41:47 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

“That is the counter argument. Science sprang from Christianity, and not from other religions. The persecutions of the Church were relatively feeble attempts that did not stop the development of science.”

Burning people at the stake is a feeble attempt?

“In fact, the Church did numerous things to promote science. The pope funded Galileo, as noted above, as it did many early scientists.”

In 1979 the church set up an academy to investigate Galileo. After 12 years of study they finally concluded that Galileo was right and the Church was wrong!


64 posted on 04/15/2017 11:53:17 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

“Because their basic philosophies were not compatible with scientific inquiry and the search for truth.”

“Bruno’s pantheism was also a matter of grave concern.[4] The Inquisition found him guilty, and he was burned at the stake in Rome’s Campo de’ Fiori in 1600.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno


67 posted on 04/15/2017 12:09:32 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson