Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cecily; avenir
Cecily, I'd like to say I agree with your statement, but it gets shipwrecked (or at least, caught on a reef) if the Muslim women say that in their case bondage and battery are voluntary, jut as much as that of the fictional "Anastasia Steele".

My own view is that some acts are objectively wrong, regardless of "consent." Put them in the "depraved heart" category of crime. Whether it's done to the "consenting" Anastasia Steele or the "consenting" Atika Latifi or Umm Bint-Anybody, it's reckless endangerment maybe, assault for sure.

There are some things you shouldn't legally be able to consent to. Among these: (forcible) rape, slavery, sodomy, torture, assault, murder.

11 posted on 04/13/2017 12:32:23 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Well, let’s put it this way: for the women who don’t volunteer for beatings and subjugation in our society, the law will protect them and is on their side. In majority Islamic societies or communities, not so much.


20 posted on 04/13/2017 1:58:33 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson