Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigbob

How about they vote to keep the promises they ran on?

How about they vote for the principals they swore to uphold?

Or do you have a problem with that?


8 posted on 04/11/2017 11:00:35 PM PDT by moonhawk (My Basket of Deplorable is Irredeemably mired in the Swamp of Crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: moonhawk

Really?

What sacred “promise” requires the Freedom Caucus to vote WITH Nancy Pelosi to preserve ObamaCare as it is?

What new “principle” is so very important that the Freedom Caucus feels free to ignore America’s ancient principle of “majority rule”? Yes, that ancient principle DOES mean that the 30 or so members of the Freedom Caucus, having presented and promoted their proposals, have a DUTY to submit to the final decisions of the majority.

And why should an elected representative, who neglected to inform voters that he was unable to negotiate in “good faith” with other representatives, be re-elected?

So I find I do have a problem supporting people who act to keep ObamaCare in place, and then go out to raise campaign funds by ranting about ObamaCare’s existence.


11 posted on 04/12/2017 9:55:11 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson