Just about everything on Drudge’s headlines have been these british rags. I don’t get the trend.
They are fickle and behave like 13 year olds.
"US is planning missile strikes on Damascus, claims Putin"
http://news.sky.com/story/us-is-planning-attacks-on-damascus-to-blame-assad-claims-putin-10833716
"Vladimir Putin says he expects 'fake' gas attacks in Damascus to justify further US strikes on Syria"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/11/vladimir-putin-says-expects-fake-gas-attacks-damascus-justify/
"US plans to attack Syria and blame Assad, Vladimir Putin claims"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/vladimir-putin-us-bomb-syria-russia-blame-bashar-al-assad-air-strikes-chemical-attack-a7678391.html
"Putin says expects 'fake' gas attacks to discredit Syria's Assad"
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/putin-says-expects--fake--gas-attacks-to-discredit-syria-s-assad/43102586
British rags to be sure, but remember all the times we commented here: “Why are we learning what is happening here in the US from this Brit journo?” while it was straight crickets from our own Winston Smiths.
We get plenty of disinformation from our guys because they have expressly admitted (Mika Alphabet) their belief that 1. their job is to tell us what to think, and 2. they claim objectivity, but their actions belie their political ideology.
Back to the 1984 analogy, they even seemed to believe their own polls. Or did they? Why would they keep tapping candidate Trump if they thought they had it in the bag?